No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

2,941 results for “General Electric”, page 15 of 148

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 17, 2018 · in the opinion

    Grimes v. AT&T Corp. (2018)

    …III, Caruso Pope Edell Picini, P.C. & RICHARD DOMINICK PICINI, CARUSO SMITH EDELL PICINI, PC. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant, represented by CHRISTOPHER J. KEALE, TANENBAUM KEALE LLP, DAVID SCHUYLER BLOW, TANENBAUM KEALE LLP & MICHAEL A. TANENBAUM…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 3, 2009 · in the opinion

    Fuller v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)

    …Denver, Inc.; Gardner-Gibson, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Gibson Homans Co.; Garlock, Inc.; General Electric Co.; Georgia-Pacific Corp.; Glidden Co.; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Gould Pumps; Griffin Wheel Co.; Hanson Pipe & Products Minnesota…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion

    Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2010)

    …Elliot Turbomachinery Co., 545 F.Supp.2d 1266, 1273 (S.D.Fla.2008) (citing Nesbiet v. General Electric Co., 399 F.Supp.2d 205, 212 (S.D.N.Y.2005)). Although these arguments may undermine the…

  4. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · October 12, 2001 · in the opinion

    Bailey v. North American Refractories Co. (2001)

    …the electrical shop on direct current (DC) motors. Gray testified that he mainly worked with General Electric or Westinghouse motors. Specifically, he stated: I mainly worked on DC equipment and it was Westinghouse and General Electric…

  5. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Chapin v. A & L Parts, Inc. (2007)

    …125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993),\[2\] and its progeny, Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 470 Mich. 749, 685 N.W.2d 391 (2004), General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 118 S.Ct. 512…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 10, 2019 · in the opinion

    Savoie v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2019)

    …Patrick Kevin Shockey, Blue Williams, LLP & Richard Marshall Perles, Lee, Futrell & Perles, LLP. CBS Corporation, formerly known as & General Electric Company, Cross Defendants, represented by John Joseph Hainkel, III, Frilot L.L.C., Angela M. Bowlin…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion

    Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    …to Square D for use in the manufacture or assembly of molded or bonded component parts in certain electrical equipment products which may or may not have contained asbestos:... Union Carbide Corporation \[and\] General Electric.... (Id…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 26, 2019 · in the opinion

    Savoie v. Huntington Ingalls (2019)

    …Patrick Kevin Shockey, Blue Williams, LLP & Richard Marshall Perles, Lee, Futrell & Perles, LLP. CBS Corporation, formerly known as & General Electric Company, Cross Defendants, represented by John Joseph Hainkel, III, Frilot L.L.C., Angela M. Bowlin…

  9. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)

    …and Doyle, P. J., concur. \[1\] We note that this Court granted General Electric Company's motion to withdraw its appeal from Case No. A11A2025. \[2\] OCGA § 51-12-33 (d) provides as follows: (d) (1…

  10. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · August 31, 2007

    Asbestos Corporation Limited v. Akaiwa (2007)

    …summary judgment is limited to the materials designated to the trial court, so evidence first offered on appeal is not considered. Product Identification; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Everett Electric electrical contractor Everett Electric 1980-1982

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 3, 2012

    Walker v. Abb, Inc. (2012)

    …discovery, such as sales records and details of a sale of its division, that could bear on whether its products were a source of exposure. Product Identification; Successor Liability; Trial Procedure and Discovery electrician 1952-1987

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 17, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …cause), a plaintiff must produce specific evidence that the decedent inhaled asbestos fibers from the defendant's product. Evidence that the defendant sold asbestos-containing products in general does not meet that burden. Causation; Product Identification…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · April 27, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …Gay had served in the Navy, Air Force, at General Electric and at Stone & Webster, and had done automotive work. The estate claimed exposure to asbestos in Atwood valves aboard the submarine USS Seawolf and at…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · July 7, 2023

    McIsaac v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …asbestos exposure; by May 2023 all had settled except Buffalo Pumps' successor, Air & Liquid Systems, and General Electric. Buffalo moved for summary judgment. The court applied maritime law because some exposure occurred on Navy vessels, which…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · March 12, 2019

    MacLachlan v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2019)

    …furnace, where he wore protective coats and mittens he believed were made by American Optical. He also claimed exposure to a General Electric steam turbine aboard the USS Kennedy. American Optical moved for summary judgment. It…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · April 27, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …Mr. Gay had worked in the Navy, the Air Force, at General Electric and at Stone & Webster, and had done automotive work. The claim against Mueller Steam concerned 1974 to 1976, when he worked at the…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · April 27, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …the 1940s and 1950s. His career included the Navy, Air Force, General Electric, Stone and Webster and automotive work. The court held that maritime law applied because the exposure occurred on naval vessels. It then reviewed…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · April 26, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …He died in April 2020. He served in the Navy and Air Force and later worked for General Electric and Stone and Webster. He said he thought he remembered Durametallic gaskets or packing at Naval Air…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 24, 2020

    Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …and medical expert as speculative, and rejected them again. It granted the three motions and denied Deem's motions on affirmative defenses as moot. General Electric and CBS remained and were asked for a status report.

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 29, 2016 · in the opinion

    Malone v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Nash Engineering Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Eric Scott Thompson, Franklin & Prokopik. Velan Valve Corporation, Cross Defendant, represented by Donald Robert Kinsley, Maron…