No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

1,462 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 18 of 74

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rondon v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2016)

    …is imposed for three types of product defects: manufacturing defects, design defects, and warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\] (Anderson).…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2014)

    …Inc., 799 A.2d 71, 86 (Pa.Super.2002) (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 622-23 (Pa.Super.1999)) ("In asbestos litigation, evidence is sufficient to establish product identity where…

  3. Court case · Virginia Court of Appeals · August 27, 2002 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. DuPONT (2002)

    …Id. at 36. "\\[N\]ot everyone who develops asbestosis develops mesothelioma, and it is not necessary to have asbestosis to have mesothelioma.'" Id. at 352 (quoting Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Hammond, 198 Ill. App.3d…

  4. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 13, 2013 · in the opinion

    Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)

    …289 P.3d at 195; see Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 510 N.W.2d 854, 861 (Iowa 1994) (finding that "it is not necessary and indeed may be impossible to establish exactly how much…

  5. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 15, 2011 · in the opinion

    Rodarmel v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2011)

    …McClure, the plaintiffs presented evidence, and the jury was entitled to find, that four asbestos companies (Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Owens-Illinois, UNARCO, and Johns-Manville) all had engaged in the same sorts of wrongful conduct…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)

    …supra, 205 Cal.App.4th at p. 88; Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1668 \[57 Cal.Rptr.2d 525\]), and we have no cause to address them here. While…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Sandoval v. American Appliance Manufacturing Corp. (2017)

    …We disagree. The purpose of punitive damages is "to punish wrongdoing and deter future misconduct by either the defendant or other potential wrongdoers." (Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1658…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    …the forum non conveniens motion can be granted. In that regard, Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen) is instructive. Hansen was an asbestos case with 200 named defendants. (Id…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Covil Corporation (2021)

    …For instance, Appellant cites Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, where we affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the issue of causation. See 69 F.3d at 716…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 23, 2022 · in the opinion

    Sampey v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  11. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 14, 2001 · in the opinion

    Parks v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …to create a genuine issue of material fact concerning product identification. Relying on Harris v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 102 F.3d 1429 (7th Cir.1996), the trial court found that the Parkses had failed to…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Roussell v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · April 12, 2007 · in the opinion

    Hilbert v. Aeroquip, Inc. (2007)

    …Hilbert has attempted to avoid removal by narrowing his complaint. See Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F.Supp.2d 653, 658 (E.D.Tex.1999) ("once a defendant properly removes a case to federal…

  14. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 25, 2005 · in the opinion

    Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2005)

    …Gelfand's partner, Dr. Stanley Altschuler. 818 A.2d at 514. The Quate Court cited Taylor v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 446 Pa.Super. 174, 666 A.2d 681, 687 (1995), for the proposition that shortness…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Sampey v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 10, 2016 · in the opinion

    Wines v. Abb, Inc. (2016)

    …federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …plaintiffs have raised a genuine dispute as to whether Sparkman was exposed to asbestos from his work with and around a Research-Cottrell precipitator on a frequent and regular basis. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…

  18. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Daniels v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2019)

    …No. 4 does not adequately convey the concept of concurrent causation and the trial court properly declined to accept it as part of the jury instruction. See Skonberg v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 215 Ill. App…

  19. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 26, 2010 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. AJ Friedman Supply Co. (2010)

    …the exact documents, studies, or articles on which he had relied, they could not have examined the accuracy of his opinions. Mauro v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 225 N.J.Super. 196, 206, 542 A.2d…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · July 23, 1993 · in the opinion

    Maiorana v. United States Mineral Prods. Co. (In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit., 1993)

    …individually and successor-in-interest to Keasbey-Mattison Company; Raymark Industries, Inc.; individually and as successor-in-interest to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.; Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.; U.S. Mineral Products Company; H.K. Porter Company, Inc.…