1,307 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”, page 33 of 66
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 14, 2006 · in the opinion
In re Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2006)
…stopped settling claims collectively, effective February 1, 2001. U.S. Gypsum, Union Car bide, T & N, Quigley, and GAF all experienced an increase in settlement amounts post-CCR. 5/23/06 AM Tr. 55-57 (Myer…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Idaho · October 1, 2018
Stephens v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (2018)
The court denied Union Pacific's motion for judgment on the pleadings because it had waived its preemption defense, but granted Union Pacific summary judgment because the Stephenses lacked evidence of exposure and causation, and denied…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · August 28, 2019
Stephens v. Union Pacific R. Co. (2019)
The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Union Pacific Railroad and against William and Norma Stephens, because Stephens did not show that exposure attributable to Union Pacific was a substantial factor in causing his mesothelioma. Under…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · November 17, 1987
Speck v. Union Elec. Co. (1987)
The appeals court reversed the trial court's dismissal of the wrongful death count against employer Union Electric and remanded so the children of Stephen Speck could replead; the claim over the initial illness stayed barred…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska · October 22, 2020
Butler v. Union Pacific R. Co. (2020)
The district court denied Union Pacific's motion for summary judgment, holding that Butler's 2011 asbestosis release did not bar his FELA claim for colorectal cancer, so Butler prevailed on the motion. Under FELA § 5…
-
Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · May 19, 1987
Speck v. Union Elec. Co. (1987)
…as final under Rule 81.06 was effective and not an abuse of discretion, overruled Union Electric's motion to dismiss the appeal, and sent the case back to the Court of Appeals to decide the…
-
Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · June 13, 2007
Union Bank OF California, NA v. Copeland Lumber Yards, Inc. (2007)
…months after that judgment, Nagl died. His estate's personal representative, Union Bank of California, then brought a wrongful death action for the estate and his three children, seeking $2.7 million. The trial court granted…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 3, 2024
Ditcharo v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (2024)
…jurisdiction over the remaining claims, including the FELA claims against Union Pacific. A defendant that raises a colorable federal contractor defense and acted under a federal officer may remove the whole case under § 1442(a)(1…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 9, 2005
National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh v. Porter Hayden Company (2005)
The court denied the insurers' (National Union and American Home) motion on trigger of coverage, granted it on pro rata allocation, and granted it in part on completed operations aggregate limits, leaving fact questions on whether…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Maryland · March 31, 2014
National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh, PA. v. Porter Hayden Company (2014)
National Union Fire Insurance Company and American Home Assurance Company, excess insurers of Porter Hayden Company, were in a coverage dispute with Porter Hayden in bankruptcy court. The dispute concerned asbestos claims resolved by the Porter…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 27, 2018
National Union Fire Ins. Co. OF Pittsburgh, PA v. Burlington Ins. Co. (2018)
The court granted National Union's summary judgment motion in part, declaring that Burlington had a duty to defend Mayore in the World Trade Center clean-up actions, denied Burlington's motion, and left indemnity for…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 31, 2014
National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh, PA v. Porter Hayden Company (2014)
The court granted in part and denied in part the cross-motions for summary judgment: the Insurers (National Union and American Home) waived the voluntary obligation provision, but they may challenge the reasonableness of the Trust…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · July 23, 1985
Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Sepco Corp. (1985)
…for Sepco and the other insurers, holding that the injurious exposure theory governs the insurance policies and rejecting Commercial Union's manifestation theory. Under the Fifth Circuit's Porter precedent, which the court treated as binding…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · January 17, 1989
Carey Canada v. California Union Ins. Co. (1989)
…excess liability insurers (Northbrook, Home, National Union and Columbia Casualty) for a declaration about the scope of asbestos exclusions in eight policies issued from 1977 to 1982. The companies argued that the exclusions, which referred to …
-
Court case · Montana Workers' Comp. Court · June 12, 2017
Wommack v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. (2017)
Robert Wommack worked at the Cenex refinery in Laurel, Montana, from 1968 to 1998. He started as a laborer and later worked as a painter, welder, operator, pumper and maintenance foreman, then as an asphalt sales manager with an office across the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · June 1, 1989
Carey Canada Inc. v. California Union Ins. Co. (1989)
After a bench trial, the court entered judgment for the excess insurers (Home, National Union, Columbia Casualty) and against Carey Canada and Celotex, holding the policies' "asbestosis" exclusions bar all asbestos-related disease claims, and dismissed…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 22, 2021
Jack v. Dco, LLC (2021)
The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Union Pacific Railroad and judgment as a matter of law for Ford and DCo, so the Jacks lost on all claims. Under Washington law, a take-home exposure claim…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 31, 2013
Bailen v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2013)
The court denied Union Pacific Railroad Company's motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds, so plaintiffs Eddie Bailen and Rena Ash-Bailen keep their case in New York. A defendant seeking forum non conveniens…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 30, 2018
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)
…leaving in place its earlier summary judgment for Union Pacific Railroad on both the take-home and bystander exposure claims. A motion for reconsideration requires manifest error or new facts or authority that could not earlier…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 19, 2019
State EX rel. Koepf v. Industrial Commission of Ohio (2019)
…for a writ of mandamus, leaving the Industrial Commission's denial of loss-of-use compensation in place (Commission and Union Oil prevailed). A claimant seeking loss-of-use compensation under R.C. 4123.57(B)…