No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

736 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 37 of 37

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 11, 2020 · in the opinion

    Olson v. Brenntag N. Am., Inc. (2020)

    …No. 829 at 125.) But that calculation presumes that the two defendant companies will each pay the full amount of the $25 million compensatory award, which is logically impossible. (See Grabinski v Blue Springs Ford Sales…

  2. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    State EX rel. Koepf v. Industrial Commission of Ohio (2019)

    …employed as a sanitation worker. While emptying a trash container into the rear of his truck, Lowery was struck by a Ford Ranger traveling at a high rate of speed. Ultimately, Lowery was declared dead at…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 27, 2023 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …in the product's use that were known to the supplier but not to the government. Boyle, 487 U.S. at 512; Ford v. Foster Wheeler USA Corp., No. 15-cv-05426-JSW, 2016 WL 551234…

  4. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · June 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Kinseth v. Weil-McLain (2018)

    …It is not about what the family needs, it is about sending a message to a company who you've evaluated how they spend some of their money, you've evaluated some of their actions with…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2005)

    …helps the court "avoid the need to await the resolution of outside lawsuits to determine issues of liability or amount owed by means of anticipating and estimating the likely outcome of these actions." Matter of Ford…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · October 21, 2009 · in the opinion

    Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2009)

    …CORPORATION, BURNHAM BOILER CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, CLEAVERBROOKS CO., CRANE CO., DEMMING DIVISION, CRANE PACKING, CROUSE-HINDS, CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC., DANA CORPORATION, DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC., DURABLA MANUFACTURING CO., EASTERN GUNNITE CO., INC., GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio · July 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Ridenour v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (2014)

    …For purposes of considering whether Brown had exhausted his administrative remedies, this case was brought on June 1, 2010. See Ford v. Johnson, 362 F.3d 395 (7th Cir. 2004)(holding that a prisoner "brought suit"…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    Staubs v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2021)

    …103 Harv. L. Rev. 1989, 1989-97 (1990)). Maryland follows the separate disease rule in toxic exposure cases. See Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Ford, 204 Md. App. 1, 268 (2012) (Eyler, D., J., concurring in part…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 27, 1980 · in the opinion

    Grabowski v. Turner & Newall (1980)

    …Galgon. Q. When was that; when did you see Galgon? A. '78. Q. Did Dr. Ford ever tell you, specifically, that you had problems associated with breathing asbestos? A. Well, he told me, I had asbestosis…

  10. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · October 13, 2021 · in the opinion

    Poce v. O & G Industries, Inc. (2021)

    …those offered by the moving party ... such allegations must be supported by counteraffidavits or other documentary submissions that controvert the evidence offered in support of summary judgment." GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Ford, 144 Conn. App. 165…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · June 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Hall v. Kodak Occupational Accidental Death Insurance Plan (2011)

    …pertinent part, as follows: 7.01 On-the-Job Injuries The benefits will be payable in the event that an Employee sustains a bodily injury in the course of his employment with the Company and, within…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 19, 1984 · in the opinion

    Colombo v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)

    …Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., for Amatex Corp. Lise Luborsky, Duane, Morris & Heckscher, Philadelphia, Pa., for D.A.R. Industrial Products, Inc. Robert St. Leger Goggin, Philadelphia, Pa., for Johns-Manville Corp., Johns-Manville Sales Corp. Edward J…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · December 18, 1998 · in the opinion

    Brown & Root, Inc. v. Sain (1998)

    …or in the alternative, of proving that the pre-existing conditions were necessary for \[d\]ecedent to die in November 1994." Joint Appendix at 892 (emphases added). We conclude that the ALJ's statement of the…

  14. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · August 7, 2018 · in the opinion

    Mohn v. CBS Corporation (2018)

    …N.W.2d 308. In Peter, we analyzed an asbestos claim that sought application of an exception to the protections of the statute of repose for "\[d\]amages that were sustained before April 29, 1994." Id., …

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · April 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Rocha v. Brown & Gould, LLP (2015)

    …Burlington, which cites Lish, involved false statements made by an applicant to an insurance company in an insurance application, and the case dealt with a negligent misrepresentation claim [\86] under § 552 of the Restatement (Second) of…

  16. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · January 27, 2015 · in the opinion

    Peter v. Sprinkmann Sons Corp. (2015)

    …claim because: (1) the damages exception in § 893.89(4)(d), allowing claims for "\[d\]amages that were sustained before April 29, 1994" applies because Donald's exposure to asbestos occurred long before April 29, 1994…