No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

2,942 results for “General Electric”, page 37 of 148

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Bankhead v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)

    …Baker & McKenzie (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1137-1138.) We give only a general summary of the facts relating to liability and compensatory damages, because the details are not germane to the issues presented by…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …this work, on its own, leaves only the general possibility that Covil insulation was likewise present. Plaintiffs next argue that Mr. Vinson worked in close proximity to Covil employees who were installing or maintaining insulation. The…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …the insulation at the RJ Reynolds plant," he answered that he did not "recall exactly who was working" and testified only that Daniel employees were general contractors who "did all kind of different jobs." (ECF No…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 24, 2021 · in the opinion

    Barrosse v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2021)

    …of North America, wherein the Court noted the "general rule" that, "injuries sustained by employees when going to or returning from their regular place of work are not deemed to arise out of and in the…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2007 · in the opinion

    Brumley v. Fdcc California, Inc. (2007)

    …to the heir.' \[Citations.\] Thus, in a wrongful death action the \injury' is not the general loss of the decedent, but the particular loss of the decedent to each individual claimant." (San Diego Gas & Electric, supra…

  6. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 5, 2010 · in the opinion

    Buttitta v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2010)

    …CO., C.L. ZIMMERMAN of DELAWARE, a successor corporation to C.L. ZIMMERMAN COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORP., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., a successor corporation to ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., and as a successor in interest to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 5, 2016 · in the opinion

    Evans v. Foster Wheeler Energy, Corporation (2016)

    …U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). (D.I. 1) Defendants CBS Corporation, f/k/a/ Westinghouse Electric Corporation\[1\] ("Westinghouse"), and Crane Co. ("Crane") joined in Foster Wheeler's Notice of Removal. (D.I. 4; D…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 7, 2016 · in the opinion

    Ahnert v. Employers Insurance Company OF Wausau (2016)

    …of Daniel Ahnert, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU, PABST BREWING COMPANY, SPRINKMANN SONS CORPORATION, WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, Defendants. Case No. 13-C-1456. January 7, 2016. United States District Court, E.D…

  9. Court case · Georgia Supreme Court · September 9, 2013 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific, LLC v. Fields (2013)

    …GENERAL CABLE INDUSTRIES, INC., individually and as a successor in interest to BICC CABLES CORP." For the purposes of this opinion, we assume that "Phelps Dodge" is incorporated in references to BICC CABLES CORP., or GENERAL…

  10. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · December 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards (1990)

    … 15-1-35, citing the general rule that the statute began to run from the date of publication of the allegedly libelous statement to a third person. Staheli argued that the statute did not begin to…

  11. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 20, 2002 · in the opinion

    Gutteridge v. AP Green Services, Inc. (2002)

    …2d 1071 (2001). ¶ 28 Pennsylvania law imposes no general duty on property owners to prepare and maintain a safe building for the benefit of a contractor's employees who are working on that building. Mentzer v…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 15, 2015 · in the opinion

    Soto v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. (2015)

    …pain and suffering of the decedent, which is not recoverable as a general rule." The court nonetheless permitted Gabriel to testify about "\[h\]elping out Grandpa towards the end," including giving him morphine, changing his diapers…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 12, 2003 · in the opinion

    Breaux v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)

    …Inc.; Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc.; Hopeman Brothers, Inc.; and Western Electric Corporation (now Viacom, Inc.) for damages allegedly sustained as a result of Mr. Breaux's exposure to asbestos. Plaintiffs allege their damages, including Mr. Breaux's…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Ms. Finch has not shown that Pfizer reasonably should have known that the pre-1978 records may have…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 4, 2013

    Wilson v. 3M Company (2013)

    …a jury must decide, so summary judgment cannot be granted on a motion where the court would have to weigh the testimony. Product Identification; Trial Procedure and Discovery electrician installing fire alarms, switches, and other fire…

  16. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 30, 2013

    Burns v. Bechtel Corp. (2013)

    …a roving maintenance employee at Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO) power stations. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2009, and he and his wife Jean sued Bechtel, PEPCO's general contractor on construction projects at the…

  17. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 4, 2008

    Nostrom v. Chesterton (2008)

    …Nostrom plaintiffs' Labor Law 241(6) claims against it. In this Department, the general air-contaminant regulations in section 12 of the Industrial Code do not support Labor Law 241(6) liability. Even if they applied…

  18. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 5, 2012

    Martinez v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. (2012)

    …and Workers' Compensation; Successor Liability; Punitive Damages; Venue, Removal and Transfer; Choice of Law; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: DASRL textile plant, Berazategui, Berazategui electrician in the Nylon division DASRL textile plant, Berazategui Berazategui 1963-1980

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 25, 2008

    Nostrom v. Chesterton (2008)

    …of Donald Nostrom. In the First Department, the Industrial Code air-contaminant sections (12 NYCRR 12-1.4 to 1.6) are general regulations that cannot support Labor Law 241(6) liability. Even if they applied…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 25, 2019

    Lattanzio v. Rockwell Automation (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …not enough. Conflicting expert reports on general and specific causation raise fact issues that cannot be resolved on motion papers. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony Worksites: Columbia Presbyterian Hospital career electrician Columbia Presbyterian Hospital 1968-2010