1,463 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 38 of 74
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 4, 1995
Click v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1995)
The appeals court reversed the directed verdict for Owens-Corning Fiberglass and Pittsburgh Corning and remanded for trial, ruling that the Click family had presented enough circumstantial evidence that George Click was exposed to the companies…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of the Virgin Islands · September 27, 1991
Dunn v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass (1991)
The court denied Owens-Corning's motion for JNOV and for a new trial on liability, but ordered a new trial unless plaintiff Dunn accepted a reduction of compensatory damages from $1.3 million to $500…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Common Pleas · January 12, 1987
Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1987)
Lavelle sued Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Raymark Industries, Nicolet and other defendants in a products liability case over asbestos exposure. He has asbestosis but not cancer. He worked as an insulator, pipefitter and factory worker and was…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 31, 1996
McNeil v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed the Superior Court's order to the extent it allowed a new trial on the lung cancer claim (a win for Owens Corning), and affirmed a new trial limited to the…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 14, 1996
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Wasiak (1996)
The court affirmed the trial court's judgment for the plaintiffs (about $1.8 million compensatory and $3.7 million punitive damages) against Owens-Corning, overruling all eleven points of error. Under Alabama law and due…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 12, 1999
Wallic v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1999)
Sondra Wallic sued asbestos product makers and suppliers over the mesothelioma and death of her husband, Frank Wallic, Jr., a pipe insulator. The opinion says he developed the cancer allegedly from exposure to the defendants' asbestos products at…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · August 24, 1998
Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)
Gerald Feidt and his wife sued several companies in New Jersey state court, including Westinghouse (later renamed CBS), over his mesothelioma. He alleged he was exposed to asbestos while working aboard the U.S.S. Enterprise at the Newport News…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 9, 2001
Emery v. Owens-Corporation (2001)
Wayne Bendily, an insulator employed by Anco Insulations, worked intermittently at Exxon's Baton Rouge refinery from about 1965 to 1970. He was diagnosed with asbestosis and sued Exxon as a premises owner, along with others. His wife, Mary, claimed…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 23, 2005
Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2005)
Thomas Jefferson was one of several hundred plaintiffs suing over asbestos exposure. His claim against his former employer, Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring, alleged that he worked for Cooper as a longshoreman on the Mississippi River in 1965 and at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 20, 1981
Carbonaro v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)
The federal court granted Owens-Corning Fiberglas's motion for summary judgment, holding the plaintiffs' asbestos suit barred by the prior state-court judgment for the defendants, so the plaintiffs lost. Under claim preclusion, a final…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · May 15, 1998
Porter Hayden v. Bullinger (1998)
…vacated the trial court's apportionment of damages in the Grimshaw and Granski cases, ruling for Owens Corning and Porter Hayden against the plaintiffs, and remanded for further proceedings. A trial court may not withhold from…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · May 3, 1995
Rohrbaugh v. Celotex Corp. (1995)
The Tenth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding that its earlier decision was the law of the case and the plaintiffs, the daughters of Dorothy Palmer, offered no new evidence. Under the law…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · December 11, 1990
Knox v. AC & S, Inc. (1990)
The court denied Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.'s summary judgment motion, so the estate of Darrel Knox, the plaintiff, could continue its asbestos suit against OCF. Indiana's occupational disease act makes compensation the exclusive remedy…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 28, 1995
Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1995)
…Consorti, ordered a new trial on John Consorti's pain and suffering unless he accepts remittitur to $3.5 million, and otherwise affirmed the judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, which had appealed. In a diversity case…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 18, 1979
Weinberg v. Johns-Manville Prods. Corp. (1979)
The majority held that Owens-Corning Fiberglas was entitled to summary judgment, rejecting Special Term's denial of its motion as premature; Owens-Corning won and the plaintiff and Johns-Manville lost. One justice dissented and…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · December 18, 2003
In re Kensington Intern. Ltd. (2003)
Creditors in two of five asbestos-related Chapter 11 bankruptcies (Owens Corning and W.R. Grace) asked the Third Circuit for writs of mandamus. They wanted District Judge Alfred Wolin removed from the cases because of…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 1993
Krivanek v. Fibreboard Corp. (1993)
The court affirmed the liability finding against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and the damages awards to Mr. Krivanek's estate and children, but reversed the denial of a new trial on Mrs. Krivanek's damages and remanded…
-
Court case · North Carolina Supreme Court · November 5, 1985
Wilder v. Amatex Corp. (1985)
The North Carolina Supreme Court reversed the summary judgments for Owens-Corning and for the other defendant appellees, ruling for plaintiff J.W. Wilder against Owens-Corning, Eagle-Picher, Pittsburgh Corning, Celotex, Keene and Starr-Davis…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · April 3, 2008
State EX rel. Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (2008)
…Supreme Court reversed the court of appeals' mandamus grant and held that the Industrial Commission did not abuse its discretion in naming Pilkington, successor to Libbey Owens Ford's self-insured claims, as the amenable employer…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 8, 2007
State EX rel. Pilkington N. AM. v. Indus. Comm. (2007)
…Apportionment and Settlement Credits Worksites: Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant; Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant (Plant 6 and Thermopane Plant 9), Rossford laborer, furnace tender, and crew leader Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant (Plant 6 and…