153 results for “Reaction Department”, page 5 of 8
-
Court case · Utah Supreme Court · January 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Riggs v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2015)
…as a reaction to the "unsettled status" of wrongful death around the country.\[24\] Utah Code section 78B-3-106 differs significantly from Lord Campbell's Act-and those state statutes most closely derived from Lord…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 21, 1985 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)
…and evokes the strongest of emotions. This prejudice must be coupled with the lack of effectiveness of any limiting instruction to eliminate the emotional reaction from the minds of the jury. Looking just at the first…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · April 13, 1999 · in the opinion
Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)
…3201, listed specific activities by a defendant which would subject it to the personal jurisdiction of this state.\[2\] In reaction to [\885] the decision of the United States Supreme Court in World-Wide Volkswagen Corp…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 14, 1990 · in the opinion
Owens Corning Fiberglas v. Ind. Comm'n (1990)
…respiratory movements, the asbestos fibers work into the tissues outside the bronchia and into the peribronchial tissues where the fibers seem to set up an inflammatory or fibrotic reaction which results in scar tissue formation. According…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)
…falls on the spilled contents of a bottle of Drano, and for bodily injury caused by an allergic reaction to chlorine \[splashed from\] a public pool. Although Drano and chlorine are both irritants or contaminants that…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995 · in the opinion
Schiavo v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)
…any error, as opposed to the jurors' normal reaction to a graphic exposure to the effects of advanced mesothelioma. While there is no New Jersey case specifically authorizing a "day in the life" tape, such tapes…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · September 22, 1987 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation (1987)
…J., dissenting). Whatever may have been the reaction of the courts in earlier times, we are persuaded that the district court properly considered the common law of New Jersey to be within the scope of the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 27, 2019 · in the opinion
Hall v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)
…55. Furthermore, Defendants contend that Plaintiff cannot establish that the Class Members' alleged losses are attributable to the alleged misrepresentations rather than "overall market trends and market reaction to litigation risk." Id. at 58-60. For…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · December 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization v. Wheeler (2020)
…end use or only those changes of composition which have no commercial purpose separate from that of the article, and that result from a chemical reaction that occurs upon end use of other chemical substances, mixtures…
-
Court case · Utah Supreme Court · November 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Boynton v. Kennecott Utah Copper, LLC (2021)
…and thereby injures another. In Jeffs, we found it foreseeable that negligently prescribing medications to a patient might result in the patient then injuring someone else in situations where the medications cause a psychotic reaction. Id. …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · September 26, 2024 · in the opinion
Smargisso v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…the testimony is not unfairly prejudicial or confusing. Warren is free to cross-examine Orton at trial about his initial reaction when asked about Warren by Warren's counsel, as compared to his later answers when…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 29, 1989 · in the opinion
Fusaro v. Porter-Hayden Co. (1989)
…initial exposure, is characterized by diffuse, interstitial fibrotic pulmonary reaction. The effects of asbestosis are generally cumulative in that the continued exposure to asbestos dust increases both the risk and severity of the disease. The lungs…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2008 · in the opinion
Clemmer v. John Crane, Inc. (2008)
…trial by video deposition because he was too ill to travel. The record established that Clemmer had recently undergone a long course of chemotherapy and had suffered a severe allergic reaction. At the time of trial…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · March 7, 2016 · in the opinion
Pecher v. Weyerhaeuser Company (2016)
…at trial with Dr. Anderson, and the jury can assess whether his reaction to a hypothetical situation with three sources of unknown amounts is different from his prior deposition testimony — and, if so, whether this later…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 25, 2021 · in the opinion
In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation (2021)
…does not assist in the defense of the referenced litigation and was primarily designed to minimize the public's potential reaction to an adverse verdict. Tab 95 — P2\_JNJTALC\_000011141 This is an email with an…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 29, 1981 · in the opinion
Bunker v. National Gypsum Co. (1981)
…it is progressive and apparently irreversible. As Dr. Selikoff characterizes the medical reaction. "Thus a workman who has been continually exposed to asbestos for, let us say, twenty-five years carries within him a composite biological…
-
Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · February 15, 2018 · in the opinion
Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Oakes EX rel. Hagan (2018)
…the Supreme Court noted that a setoff had occurred in Ayers, and there was no negative reaction or treatment of the setoff in the opinion. According to Ayers: "After reduction for three claimants' comparative negligence from…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 28, 1995 · in the opinion
Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1995)
…of cases which involve substantially the same questions of fact, as happens when large numbers of plaintiffs allege that they have developed similar illnesses in reaction to a particular toxic substance. See Fed.R.Civ.P…
-
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 23, 1997 · in the opinion
Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley (1997)
…reaction to an increased risk of dying. An external circumstance—exposure—makes some emotional distress more likely. But how can one determine from the external circumstance of exposure whether, or when, a claimed strong emotional reaction…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 9, 1981 · in the opinion
Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1981)
…because of the internal reaction to asbestos fibers lodged in the lungs. An uncontradicted affidavit on file prepared by Dr. Nathan Grossman, an expert retained by the plaintiffs, establishes that the reaction of persons exposed to…