No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

1,463 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 52 of 74

  1. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 25, 2002 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. Lockheed Shipbuilding Corp. (2002)

    …The court stated that its result was not contrary to the exclusive remedy provisions of the statute "because Owens-Corning incurs liability for two separate activities: (1) acts which occurred during the employment relationship and (2…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)

    …dangerous to place the product in the hands of a user without a suitable warning or if no warning is given. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1000 \[281 Cal.Rptr…

  3. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 15, 2013 · in the opinion

    Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)

    …at 548, 217 A.2d at 675; see also Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 510 N.W.2d 854, 863 (Iowa 1994) (quoting In re Joint Eastern and Southern District Asbestos Litigation, 129 B.R…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2022 · in the opinion

    Hilster v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …Aurora Pump Co., 2004 WL 2222935, at [\1] (Conn. Super. Sept. 14, 2004) (quoting Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F. Supp. 172, 174 (W.D. Mich. 1989)). "The plaintiff must produce evidence sufficient to…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 29, 2012 · in the opinion

    Fisher v. Sexauer (2012)

    …Armstrong World Industries, Inc. 799 A.2d 71, 86 (Pa.Super.2002) (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning, 729 A.2d 614, 622-23 (Pa.Super.1999)). Nevertheless, Eckenrod's threshold standard does not establish an immutable…

  6. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2012 · in the opinion

    Macias v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2012)

    …To hold manufacturers of safety equipment liable for harm caused by other manufacturers' dangerous products is contrary to precedent and public policy. I dissent. WE CONCUR: CHARLES W. JOHNSON and SUSAN OWENS, Justices, and GERRY L…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 21, 2015 · in the opinion

    Scainetti v. BW/IP (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    …plaintiff mixed, worked with, and was exposed to asbestos fibers used in defendant's product\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · December 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Settlemyer v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2021)

    …has held that a plaintiff must "prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  9. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion

    In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)

    …discovery response marked as Exhibit 203 identifies 10 bankrupt entities, including Armstrong, Babcock & Wilcox, Fibreboard, Owens Corning, USG, and others. See Garlock Exhibit 203 at 7-30. To the extent that Garlock offered these documents to…

  10. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · September 18, 2014 · in the opinion

    Walston v. Boeing Company (2014)

    …Indianapolis, IN, 46268, Amicus Curiae on behalf of COAlition for Litigation Justice, Inc. OWENS, J. In 1911, the legislature passed the Industrial Insurance Act (IIA), Title 51 RCW, creating a no-fault system for efficiently compensating…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 4, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …not arise out of the employee-employer relationship of plaintiff and defendant; Owens-Corning under these circumstances is essentially a third party manufacturer outside of the plaintiff's employment relationship with another company." Id. at 306…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · July 17, 2003 · in the opinion

    Bath Iron Works Corp. v. US Dept. of Labor (2003)

    …of inquiry a reasonable person would have conducted in light of the surrounding facts and circumstances. See, e.g., Love v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Co., 27 B.R.B.S. 148 (1993). This requirement, in effect…

  13. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · November 13, 2009 · in the opinion

    Van Fossen v. MidAmerican Energy Co. (2009)

    …section 427, one who employs an independent contractor to do work which the employer knows or has reason to know involves an "abnormally dangerous activity" owes a nondelegable duty to those exposed to the hazard. Restatement…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 28, 2011 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. 630 Third Ave. Assocs. (2011)

    …of exposure by the plaintiff herein constitutes a separately compensable injury. In support, plaintiffs rely on Consorti v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 86 NY2d 449 \[1995\], in which the Court of Appeals found that a widow…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 17, 2023 · in the opinion

    Crossland v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2023)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 1, 2022 · in the opinion

    Labarre v. Bienville Auto Parts Inc. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …case "must present \evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods.…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Hammell v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …S. 121, 124-26, 129-35 (1989); Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998). The Court analyzes the requirements and determines that the Contractor Defendants satisfy each. A. Corporate…

  19. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · July 11, 2011 · in the opinion

    Price v. EI DuPont de Nemours & Co. (2011)

    …they discuss foreseeability and policy. For example, in Olivo v. Owens-Ill., Inc., the New Jersey Supreme Court held that, "to the extent Exxon Mobil owed a duty to workers on its premises for the foreseeable…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)

    …must present \evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…