1,463 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 58 of 74
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 27, 2022 · in the opinion
King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2022)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 13, 2015 · in the opinion
Juni v. Ford Motor Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)
…upon a fair interpretation of the evidence that no valid line of reasoning or set of permissible inferences exist that would permit the jurors to arrive at the verdict reached." (Zalinka v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 3, 2004 · in the opinion
Bartel v. John Crane, Inc. (2004)
…has suffered damages; and, 3) prove that defendant's asbestos-containing product was a substantial factor in causing his damages. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W.D.Mich.1989); Stark…
-
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · March 10, 2003 · in the opinion
Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Ayers (2003)
…App. 1993) (citing Hagerty v. L & L Marine Servs., Inc., 788 F. 2d 315, 318 (CA5 1986)); Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 30 Ohio Misc. 2d 11, 14, 507 N. E. 2d 476, 480 (Ct…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · January 10, 1990 · in the opinion
Farrall v. AC & S. Co., Inc. (1990)
…C. § 6304(b) Pro Rata Share of Released Tortfeasors: Combustion Eng. 2% Delaware Ins. 4% Eagle Picher 10% Fibreboard 4% Owens Corn. Fib. 8% Owens-Ill. 3% Pitts. Corn. 3% Cent Cl Res. 29% \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Total Share…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 21, 1996 · in the opinion
BellSouth Telecommunications v. WR Grace (1996)
…theories of claim accrual were applied in the context of an asbestos abatement case by the District of Connecticut in West Haven Sch. Dist. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 721 F.Supp. 1547 (D.Conn.1988).
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 5, 2016 · in the opinion
Watkins v. Affinia Group (2016)
…from 1957 to 1958, where he was exposed to rolls of asbestos insulation and asbestos pipe covering. Owens Corning Fiberglass sold the insulation to the Babcock facility while Glenn worked there. The insulation, known as "Kaylo…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 23, 2019 · in the opinion
Chevron Oronite Company v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc. (2019)
…3d 1101 (La. App. 2017) ($750,000 to each adult child of 59-year-old deceased mother); Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 878 So. 2d 631 (La. App. 2004) ($250,000 to each adult child…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2012 · in the opinion
Shields v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)
…strictly liable for failure to warn of risks arising from other manufacturers' products — the court began with the general rule formulated in its decision in Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 28, 2017 · in the opinion
Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)
…identify "a reasonable basis for determining the contribution of each cause to a single harm." Restatement (Second) of Torts § 433A(1) (1965); see Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 515 Pa. 377, 528 A.2d 947…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 18, 2016 · in the opinion
Untermann v. D. Zelinsky & Sons, Inc. (2016)
…Citation.\]" (McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 1098, 1103; see Rutherford v. Owens-Williams, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976-977.) Direct evidence of exposure is not required; rather, the plaintiff…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2018)
…that they do not have any burden to offer evidence demonstrating federal jurisdiction until the plaintiff challenges jurisdiction in a motion to remand. Dart Cherokee Basin Op. Co. v. Owens, 135 S. Ct. 547, 553 (2014)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 24, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs (and Avondale)—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…products, "in the scope of \[the plaintiff's\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571N.W.2d530, 533 (Mich…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 28, 2022 · in the opinion
Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)
…Court did not create new substantive law in Halphen, but merely compiled and interpreted the law with regard to products liability in Louisiana at that time." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · February 18, 2010 · in the opinion
McCann v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2010)
…State, except in favor of a citizen thereof, who has held the cause of action from the time it accrued." \[4\] In Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 529 (Buttram), we…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 9, 2006 · in the opinion
Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2006)
…would not have been affected by the plaintiff's previous claim for increased risk and fear of cancer. ¶ 9 Similarly, in McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 715 A.2d 1125 (Pa.Super. 1998), this Court…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · April 4, 2002 · in the opinion
Upsher v. Grosse Pointe Public School System (2002)
…C. § 1983 claim and the intentional tort exception to the MWDCA. II. ANALYSIS This court reviews a district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Owens Corning v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 23, 2020 · in the opinion
Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson (2020)
…is reversed in part on the claims of the two Non-Resident Plaintiffs, Allan Koman on behalf of Annette Koman and Marcia Owens, who only used Johnson's Baby Powder and denied using Shimmer for lack…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)
…Brooks now moves for judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiffs' products liability and negligence claims contending it owes no duty to warn or duty of care to Plaintiffs.\[2\] The Court has addressed by…