153 results for “Reaction Department”, page 8 of 8
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · September 29, 2016 · in the opinion
In re Reed (2016)
…to depose anyone but herself, wants to preserve only her own testimony about her personal and unique knowledge of her employment involving direct contact with asbestos, her reactions to it, and her medical treatment, in sum…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · January 22, 1997 · in the opinion
Sharpless v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1997)
…obesity, asthma, emphysema and allergic reactions." In view of the above-stated principles, the court finds that it is compelled to review the contents of Dr. Altschuler's testimony quite carefully to determine (1) whether it…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 27, 2010 · in the opinion
Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2010)
…allergic reactions\]\]. To establish this claim, \[name of plaintiff\] must prove all of the following: \[¶\] 1. That \[name of defendant\] \[manufactured/distributed/sold\] the \[product\]; \[¶\] 2. That the \[product\] had potential \[risks/side effects/allergic reactions…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 4, 2024 · in the opinion
Palermo v. Eagle Inc. (2024)
…the Court finds that this concern can be minimized by use of a protective order and exclusion/redaction of irrelevant financial and health records. The next factor is whether the information sought is factual data or…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · October 31, 2022 · in the opinion
In re All Matters Related TO North American Refractories Company (2022)
…with identifying information regarding lawyers and law firms, but were continuing with the remaining portion seeking an order confirming the Parties' agreement regarding the redaction of claimants' information from materials to be submitted at trial. See…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · June 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Russell v. Illinois Central Railroad Company (2015)
…throat as well.... He went on to answer the following question about both asbestos and tobacco smoke: Q. Do the larynx and the oropharynx have the same reactions to carcinogens? A. Can they both become cancerous…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion
Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)
…something beyond asbestosis, and with asbestosis, you see scarring not seen with the other forms. With the scarring and other complications of asbestos, particularly pleural reactions, come a greater risk of developing cancer. Also, while age…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion
Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2010)
…excessive cigarette smoking, heart disease, obesity, asthma, emphysema and allergic reactions. 1171 Id., at 687 n. 2. The condition the majority herein describes as compensable injury is "shortness of breath." Majority Op., at 1164. Despite Simmons…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 10, 1992 · in the opinion
Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1992)
…305 (1990) (footnote omitted) (Doctrinal Collapse). Here, where the relevant inquiry concerns the reactions of persons now deceased to hypothetical warnings, the proof of causation becomes more difficult or, depending on one's point of view…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · September 10, 1990 · in the opinion
Potts v. Celotex Corp. (1990)
…drug); Martinez-Ferrer v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 105 Cal. App.3d 316, 164 Cal. Rptr. 591 (1980) (acute allergic reactions and cataracts caused by drug); cf. Anderson v. Sybron Corp., 165 Ga. App. 566, 567-568…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · June 3, 1985 · in the opinion
Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)
…cumulative. Because inhaled fibers are not all exhaled, but some remain in the lungs and cause reactions there, the later inhalation of added amounts will cause injury that might not have occurred had exposure ceased. There…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · June 15, 1998 · in the opinion
Consorti v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (In Re Joint Eastern and Southern Dist. Asbestos, 1998)
…1979). As indicated, all plaintiffs differ. That there exists an infinite variety of people who will experience different reactions to similar tragedies further compounds the difficulty of quantifying a reasonable verdict. See Geressy, 980 F.Supp…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 12, 2024 · in the opinion
Cockrum v. Murphy (2024)
…headaches, and dizziness." Id. Boeing's general manager said "he knew these complaints were reactions to working with the phenolic material." Id. Birklid concluded that Boeing knew in advance its workers would become ill, yet put…