7 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…Pump Division, FMC CORPORATION, sued as successor of Northern Pumps and Peerless Pumps, GARDNER DENVER, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY a/k/a NAPA, sued individually and d/b/a Rayloc Brakes, GRINNELL, LLC…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 13, 1989 · in the opinion
Miller v. Celotex Corp. (1989)
…defendants. I conclude that plaintiff has failed to present sufficient persuasive evidence for a reasonable jury to rule in his favor on the running of the statute of limitations. See Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith…
-
Court case · Colorado Court of Appeals · September 12, 1991 · in the opinion
Fenton v. Fibreboard Corp. (1991)
…witnesses' services shown. In addition to the fees for expert testimony, plaintiff's bills of costs included deposition costs and "general expenses." It is unclear whether the court found these costs reasonable or which, if any…
-
Court case · Colorado Supreme Court · February 16, 1993 · in the opinion
Fibreboard Corp. v. Fenton (1993)
…their set-off against the total judgment owed by other tortfeasors. Had the General Assembly intended this additional requirement to be met prior to set-off, it simply could have included a provision so requiring in…
-
Court case · Colorado Supreme Court · September 16, 1991 · in the opinion
Miller v. Armstrong World Industries (1991)
…each possible disease related to asbestos exposure has a separate limitations period. "If this is an unfair result, the remedy for its correction lies with the General Assembly" and not with this court. Crownover v. Gleichman…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · January 2, 2013 · in the opinion
Church v. Dana Kepner Company, Inc. (2013)
…standing to file motions to quash the challenged subpoenas. The general rule is that a party has no standing to quash a subpoena served upon a third party, except as to claims of privilege or upon…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · September 16, 2012 · in the opinion
Church v. Dana Kepner Company, Inc. (2012)
…even if Plaintiff's allegations were true, the information conveyed by Johns Manville "would only have provided Dana Kepner with knowledge of the dangerous characteristics of asbestos in a general sense" (id. at 10 (emphasis added)…