No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals · June 7, 2012 · in the opinion

    Olsen v. Oklahoma Gas and Elec. Co. (2012)

    …for further proceedings. BACKGROUND\[1\] ¶ 2 In 1970, OG & E constructed an electric power generating plant, using an engineering [\942] and construction firm as general contractor. Mr. Olsen worked for an insulation contractor hired by OG…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · August 7, 2012

    Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2012)

    …dismissing Hormel from the case; the Bootenhoffs' claims against the other defendants continued. General personal jurisdiction cannot rest on a defendant's placing products in the national stream of commerce, and national advertising and a passive…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 29, 1993

    Angelo v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1993)

    …It upheld exclusion of a treating doctor's deposition because the Angelos had not shown diligent efforts to secure his attendance. It found the reverse bifurcation proper, and the jury instructions and general verdict form adequate.

  4. Court case · Oklahoma Supreme Court · October 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Galier v. Murco Wall Products, Inc. (2022)

    ¶15 A state court may exercise general jurisdiction when a defendant's "affiliations with the State are so \continuous and systematic' as to render them essentially at home in the forum State." Goodyear Dunlop Tires, 564…

  5. Court case · Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals · March 28, 2007

    Zinc Corp. OF America v. Reeder (2007)

    …s workers' compensation statute applies only to silicosis and asbestosis, not mesothelioma, so the general last-injurious-exposure rule applies, under which the last employer is liable without a minimum quantity of exposure. Causation; Expert Testimony…

  6. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Oklahoma · June 21, 2019 · in the opinion

    In re Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2019)

    …One problem with this argument is that while J & J makes general statements that the indemnification agreements and shared policies are applicable it has not produced any admissible evidence pointing to specific language in the indemnification…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · July 30, 2014 · in the opinion

    Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)

    …the place of conduct factor does not favor one state over another because the alleged conduct is spread over multiple states. See, e.g, Patten v. General Motors Corp., Chevrolet Motor Div., 699 F. Supp. 1500…