15 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 31, 2007 · in the opinion
Penn v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2007)
…Rimmel, for appellee Mobil Corporation. Oldham & Dowling, Reginald S. Kramer, and Terri L. Nass, for appellees General Electric Company and CBS Corporation. Trenz, McKay & Knabe Co., LPA, and Tim McKay, for appellee R.E. Kramig. Tucker…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 5, 2018
Matter of Adesso v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2018)
…Brooklyn Navy Yard Brooklyn 1953-1957; boilermaker, truck mechanic, and general helper Thatcher Glass Elmira 1957-1996; fireman USS Des Moines 1957-1961; boiler maintenance mechanic Happauge School District 1976-1982; welder USS Mindoro 1948-1952…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · July 23, 1993 · in the opinion
Maiorana v. United States Mineral Prods. Co. (In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit., 1993)
…in which HRH complained that the general contractor was not cleaning up the dust from the asbestos spraying. Although Castagna dismisses the examples of constructive notice as "these obscure references" which are "wholly insufficient as a…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · April 6, 1995 · in the opinion
Maiorana v. United States Mineral Prods. Co. (In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit., 1995)
…479 (1986). \[4\] Bjorn Hilt et al., Asbestos Exposure, Smoking Habits, and Cancer Incidence Among Production and Maintenance Workers in an Electrochemical Plant, 8 AM.J.INDUS.MED. 565, 571 (1985). \[5\] The court pointed out…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 14, 2017
Duty v. Trz Realty, LLC (2017)
…saying asbestos causes colon cancer. After a hearing, the trial court found he was not qualified on general or specific causation, mainly because he was not an epidemiologist or colorectal specialist. Plaintiffs then conceded they lacked…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 25, 2019
Gallagher v. American Biltrite (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…the plaintiffs' claims against it go forward. A defendant cannot get summary judgment by pointing to gaps in the plaintiff's proof. Where the parties' experts conflict on general and specific causation, issues of fact remain…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 29, 2019
Albin v. Mannington Mills (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…make a prima facie showing that its product did not contribute to the illness, and conflicting expert affidavits on general and specific causation raise fact issues for trial. Causation; Expert Testimony Worksites: House on Beach Street…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · February 3, 2011 · in the opinion
Welsh v. Ford Motor Co. (2011)
…its first assignment of error, Ford contends that plaintiff failed to meet the initial threshold of establishing that Welsh was exposed to asbestos and had a greater risk of exposure than the general public. {¶ 27} Ford…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · February 27, 1992 · in the opinion
Betts v. Manville Personal Injury Trust (1992)
…that would include fibrosis of the lungs. Plaintiffs do not contend the answers to the special interrogatories are inconsistent with the general verdicts as to Deitz and Lehr. The language employed is not ambiguous or confusing…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · September 5, 2018 · in the opinion
Alexander v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)
…This argument misses the mark. It is not "brake dust" in general that is being blamed as the causative agent in this case, but the asbestos particles contained in the Bendix brake dust from the relevant…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 3, 1985 · in the opinion
Smith v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. (1985)
…the Smiths' theory, a separate three-year period beginning with award would govern limitations "as to such employee." We do not believe the General Assembly intended so great a fragmentation of third-party actions, particularly when …
-
Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · March 25, 1991 · in the opinion
Landrigan v. Celotex Corp. (1991)
…that in toxic-tort litigation, a scientific theory of causation that has not yet reached general acceptance may be found to be sufficiently reliable if it is based on a sound, adequately-founded scientific methodology involving…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 29, 2009 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Aurora Equipment Company (2009)
…222 Ill. 2d at 437. The court then moved into a discussion of the Restatement (Second) of Torts and said that the general rule articulated in section 314A of the Restatement, "and long recognized by this…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 23, 2005 · in the opinion
Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2005)
…them for consumer use, and failing to recall or remove such products from the stream of commerce in spite of knowing of their unsafe and dangerous nature.\[6\] In addition to these general allegations, "Count Two…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska · October 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Butler v. Union Pacific R. Co. (2020)
…cancer which does not presently exist but which may develop in the future. This release includes any future damages, general or specific, that BUTLER may incur in an attempt to alleviate or cure any illness, disease…