7 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · February 27, 1989
Fisher v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1989)
Charles Fisher and his wife sued several asbestos product companies in 1985, claiming his exposure to asbestos had caused asbestosis, cancer, and possibly mesothelioma. The parties settled for $60,000, and the Fishers signed a release of all claims,…
-
Court case · Oklahoma Supreme Court · September 22, 1987
Case v. Fibreboard Corp. (1987)
Bobbie Edwin Case and his wife Eva sued twenty-two asbestos product makers in federal court in Oklahoma. Mr. Case said he was a sheet metal worker in Oklahoma from 1949 on and was exposed to asbestos-containing products made and sold by the…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 29, 1993
Angelo v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1993)
Nicholas Angelo, a maintenance supervisor and machinist, and his wife Rayma sued several makers and sellers of asbestos-containing products in federal court in Oklahoma. They alleged he was exposed to asbestos at the job sites where he worked and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · July 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)
…"a person owes a duty of care to another person whenever the circumstances place the one person in a position towards the other person such that an ordinary prudent person would recognize that if he or…
-
Court case · Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals · June 7, 2012 · in the opinion
Olsen v. Oklahoma Gas and Elec. Co. (2012)
…905 F.2d at 797-98. ¶ 25 The Court in Buttz v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 557 N.W.2d 90 (Iowa 1996), also rejected application of that state's statute of repose in an asbestos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)
…Brooks now moves for judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiffs' products liability and negligence claims contending it owes no duty to warn or duty of care to Plaintiffs.\[2\] The Court has addressed by…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · August 7, 2012 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2012)
…personal jurisdiction. The Court should consider whether the defendant: engaged in business in this state; is licensed to do business in this state; owns, leases, or controls property (real or personal) or assets in this state;…