25 results for “Reaction Department”, page 2 of 2
-
Company document · JM Knowledge Chronology · February 14, 1935
Vandiver Brown's Memorandum on the Illinois Dust Situation: Legislative and Legal Aspects (1935)
…etc. This meant that the definition included pneumoconiosis, since the current thinking is that this injury is caused by a chemical or toxic reaction rather than a physical one. As a consequence of this ruling, insurance…
-
Government report · JM Knowledge Chronology · March 24, 1930
E. R. A. Merewether and C. W. Price, Report on Effects of Asbestos Dust on the Lungs (1930)
…s description says the report was dismissed by American industry because it rested on amosite rather than chrysotile exposure. The report says nothing about any American reaction, and it found no difference in effect among chrysotile…
-
Government report · JM Knowledge Chronology · 1958
W. Clark Cooper and Lewis J. Cralley, Pneumoconiosis in Diatomite Mining and Processing (1958)
…hazard associated with marine or fresh water diatomite; (e) Fewer than 9% of all employees in the diatomite industry surveyed had X-ray evidence of pulmonary reaction to inhaled diatomaceous earth; (f) In working areas where…
-
Company document · JM Knowledge Chronology · April 5, 1957
A. R. Fisher's President's Bulletin on External and Internal Aspects of Dust and Fume Abatement (1957)
…and air pollution" showed the need for a solution "that safeguards our external position along with a practical solution for our own operations," and that managers should recognize "the potential cost of unfavorable reactions" from federal…
-
Company document · JM Knowledge Chronology · January 12, 1953
Arthur Elsenbast to Dr. Kenneth W. Smith on an Industrial Hygiene Literature File (1953)
…told Elsenbast of a hazard of diatomite he had not known. The memo says the article concerned the solubility of J-M's diatomite and its reactions with aluminum powder; it does not describe a hazard.