7 results for “General Electric”
-
Company document · JM Knowledge Chronology · April 22, 1976
R. S. Lamar to W. H. Ashton of Johnson & Johnson on Rubino's Talc Mortality Study (1976)
…others at J-M, and the letter is filed under "Talc (general)." In Johns-Manville's chronology Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows: R.S. Lamar (J…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · November 21, 1978 · in the opinion
Harig v. Johns-Manville Products (1978)
…coupled with the peculiarly harsh consequences of adherence to the general rule of accrual from the date of the "wrong," prompted our predecessors to recognize the discovery principle in determining when a cause of action accrues…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · September 10, 1973 · in the opinion
Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation (1973)
…of the same danger. This inconsistency in the jury's verdicts, although puzzling, need not detain us. It has long been the rule that consistency in general verdicts is not required. Dunn v. United States, 1932…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · September 24, 1975 · in the opinion
Karjala v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1975)
…Karjala began to feel a shortness of breath, congestion, a loss of appetite, and general weakness. Suspecting that he might have tuberculosis, he had his chest x-rayed. The x-ray showed no evidence of tuberculosis…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · November 30, 1977 · in the opinion
Bush v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation (1977)
…298 (1976), construed the 1974 amendment as retroactive in nature because of its beneficent purpose and the general rule of liberally interpreting the Workers' Compensation Act. It also held that such retroactivity did not impair any…
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · April 10, 1979 · in the opinion
Louisville Trust Co. v. Johns-Manville Products (1979)
…to run. The rule of Tomlinson is an exception to the general rule with its limitation being limited to malpractice cases.\[5\] The extent of the application of Tomlinson was irrelevant to the decision. It was…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 18, 1979 · in the opinion
Weinberg v. Johns-Manville Prods. Corp. (1979)
…situation in which the parties have appeared and entered into opposition by virtue of the pleadings. As a general rule, the relevance of this procedural aspect to the situation where the movant has exclusive knowledge impels…