289 results for “General Electric”, page 15 of 15
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · September 24, 1975 · in the opinion
Karjala v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1975)
…Karjala began to feel a shortness of breath, congestion, a loss of appetite, and general weakness. Suspecting that he might have tuberculosis, he had his chest x-rayed. The x-ray showed no evidence of tuberculosis…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court · May 25, 1972 · in the opinion
Bambrick v. Asten Hill Mfg. Co. et al. (1972)
…he meant asbestosis when he said asbestos exposure, as well as exceed our judicial prerogative. The General Assembly has limited recovery to death caused by asbestosis, not asbestos exposure. There is insufficient evidence upon which to…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · November 30, 1977 · in the opinion
Bush v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation (1977)
…298 (1976), construed the 1974 amendment as retroactive in nature because of its beneficent purpose and the general rule of liberally interpreting the Workers' Compensation Act. It also held that such retroactivity did not impair any…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · May 4, 1978 · in the opinion
Ins. Co. of No. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations (1978)
…lawsuits. D. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Cases dealing with statute of limitation issues are not applicable to this coverage problem. See, Tijsseling v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp., Ltd., 55 Cal.App.3d 623, 127 Cal…
-
Film · Films · 1979
Videotaped Deposition of Dr. Paul Kotin in the South Carolina Asbestos Cases (1979)
…asbestosis two cases of pulmonary malignancy, 6%, whereas there was an incidence of only 0.3% of this type of neoplasia among approximately 2,300 autopsies of the general population. Now, is that consistent with what…
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · April 10, 1979 · in the opinion
Louisville Trust Co. v. Johns-Manville Products (1979)
…to run. The rule of Tomlinson is an exception to the general rule with its limitation being limited to malpractice cases.\[5\] The extent of the application of Tomlinson was irrelevant to the decision. It was…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 18, 1979 · in the opinion
Weinberg v. Johns-Manville Prods. Corp. (1979)
…situation in which the parties have appeared and entered into opposition by virtue of the pleadings. As a general rule, the relevance of this procedural aspect to the situation where the movant has exclusive knowledge impels…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 21, 1979 · in the opinion
Caudle-Hyatt, Inc. v. Mixon (1979)
…husband's earnings. It is highly unlikely that the General Assembly intended to restrict the conclusive presumption of total dependency to instances where the spouse had demonstrated that he or she was wholly dependent. Such a…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · November 28, 1978 · in the opinion
Daniels v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. (1978)
… and fifth, the legal existence of the first suit. "The general rules above laid down have been held applicable, notwithstanding the fact that one suit is at law and the other in equity. Because a deposition…