9 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 25, 1982
Froud v. Celotex Corporation (1982)
Three asbestos workers, James Froud, John Friday and Wyatt Williamson, died after allegedly developing disease from prolonged exposure to asbestos products made and sold by the defendants. Froud and Friday had peritoneal mesothelioma; Williamson had…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 27, 1988
Blazek v. Nicolet, Inc. (1988)
…of Repose; Design Defect; Wrongful Death and Survival Worksites: Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UARC) plant, Cicero; Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UARC), Cicero employee at UARC Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UARC) Cicero 1951-1952
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · February 12, 1987 · in the opinion
Rice v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1987)
…s motion for summary judgment is denied. \[1\] It should also be noted that the cause of action in Union Supply arose prior to the effective date of CPLA and was not governed by its provisions.
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · May 24, 1983 · in the opinion
Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp. (1983)
…justifying such a denial are undue delay, bad faith, repeated failure to amend, and unfair prejudice to the opposing party. E.g., Union Planters National Leasing, Inc. v. Woods, 687 F.2d 117 (5th Cir. 1982)…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion
Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)
…special interrogatories on a given element of a plaintiff's claim, all material factual issues should be included in such interrogatories. Martinez v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 714 F.2d 1028, 1032 (10th Cir.1983). III…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 15, 1985 · in the opinion
Dartez v. Fibreboard Corp. (1985)
…industry. His testimony on the state of the art has the same relevance in every asbestos case, regardless of which corporations are the defendants. In view of the commonality of the state of the art issue…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1983 · in the opinion
Froud v. Celotex Corp. (1983)
…11.) A "change in that construction by this court would amount to amending the statute," and this court has acknowledged that "\[t\]he power to accomplish this does not lie in the courts." Union Electric Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · May 12, 1987 · in the opinion
Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)
…334-335, 343 N.W.2d 164 (1984) (defendants were all the Michigan suppliers of the drug DES during the time that plaintiffs ingested DES); Greene v. Union Optical, 95 Mich.App. 167, 290 N.W…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · April 27, 1989 · in the opinion
Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp. (1989)
…1966) (issue of damages, here primarily noneconomic, is within the jury's province); Power v. Union Pac. R.R., 655 [\647] F.2d 1380, 1388 (9th Cir.1981) (under Washington law, damages for loss of companionship…