No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

10 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 3, 1986 · in the opinion

    Seckular v. Celotex (1986)

    …v. Metal & Thermit Corp., 73 N.J. Super. 56, 66 (App.Div. 1962) (dismissal denied when suit in advanced stage); see also Union Carbide Corp. v. Litton Prec. Prods. Inc., 94 N.J. Super. 315 (Ch…

  2. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1989 · in the opinion

    Board of Education v. A, C & S, Inc. (1989)

    …Fillippini, Jr., Keith A. Klopferstein, Edward F. Ryan and Mark A. Stang, of counsel), for appellant Union Carbide Corp. Michael P. Connelly, Bruce C. Howard and John R. Ostojic, of Connelly, Mustes & Palmer, of Chicago, for…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 27, 1988

    Blazek v. Nicolet, Inc. (1988)

    …of Repose; Design Defect; Wrongful Death and Survival Worksites: Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UARC) plant, Cicero; Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UARC), Cicero employee at UARC Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UARC) Cicero 1951-1952

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · February 12, 1987 · in the opinion

    Rice v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1987)

    …s motion for summary judgment is denied. \[1\] It should also be noted that the cause of action in Union Supply arose prior to the effective date of CPLA and was not governed by its provisions.

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …special interrogatories on a given element of a plaintiff's claim, all material factual issues should be included in such interrogatories. Martinez v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 714 F.2d 1028, 1032 (10th Cir.1983). III…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 15, 1985 · in the opinion

    Dartez v. Fibreboard Corp. (1985)

    …industry. His testimony on the state of the art has the same relevance in every asbestos case, regardless of which corporations are the defendants. In view of the commonality of the state of the art issue…

  7. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1983 · in the opinion

    Froud v. Celotex Corp. (1983)

    …11.) A "change in that construction by this court would amount to amending the statute," and this court has acknowledged that "\[t\]he power to accomplish this does not lie in the courts." Union Electric Co…

  8. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 19, 1982 · in the opinion

    Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1982)

    …LTD., FORMERLY CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE ASBESTOS, LTD., JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, UNARCO INDUSTRIES, FORMERLY KNOWN AS UNION ASBESTOS & RUBBER COMPANY; EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., AND OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND JOHN DOE CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS…

  9. Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · August 24, 1989 · in the opinion

    District of Columbia v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (1989)

    …of actions commenced by a state after a statute of limitations would ordinarily have run.\[11\] The District of Columbia, however, has never been admitted to the Union as a state. The District is, of course…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · March 13, 1981 · in the opinion

    Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)

    …J., concurring, Boatland of Houston v. Bailey, 609 S.W.2d 743 (Tex.1980). Please consider the unison of voices at a products liability symposium at the University of Texas, Nov. 13, 1980. Russell McMains, "Indemnity…