No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

10 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 15, 1986

    Dykes v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)

    …Damages; Fault, Apportionment and Settlement Credits; Wrongful Death and Survival; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Gilbert Plastering Company, Knoxville; Union Carbide plasterer Gilbert Plastering Company Knoxville 1947-mid-1960s; utility mechanic Union Carbide mid-1960s-1967

  2. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1989 · in the opinion

    Board of Education v. A, C & S, Inc. (1989)

    …Fillippini, Jr., Keith A. Klopferstein, Edward F. Ryan and Mark A. Stang, of counsel), for appellant Union Carbide Corp. Michael P. Connelly, Bruce C. Howard and John R. Ostojic, of Connelly, Mustes & Palmer, of Chicago, for…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 27, 1986

    Zurich Ins. Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)

    …1960s. Its insurers (Zurich, Federal, Commercial Union, Globe and excess insurer Northbrook) disputed in a declaratory judgment action when their policies had to respond and who had to pay defense costs. After hearing nine medical experts…

  4. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · September 14, 1987

    Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1987)

    … no jury right. Zurich, Federal and Commercial Union won on the defense-duty issues, and Raymark won on the trigger and allocation issues. Under the policy language, an insurer must cover an asbestos claim if the…

  5. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 15, 1987

    Lockwood v. AC & S, Inc. (1987)

    …Harbor Island shipyard; Lake Union Drydock; Lake Union Drydock, Seattle; Puget Sound area shipyards; Puget Sound Bridge and Dredge (George Washington liner conversion) rigger Lake Union Drydock Seattle 1952-1972; rigger Puget Sound area shipyards 1942…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · February 12, 1987 · in the opinion

    Rice v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1987)

    …s motion for summary judgment is denied. \[1\] It should also be noted that the cause of action in Union Supply arose prior to the effective date of CPLA and was not governed by its provisions.

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …special interrogatories on a given element of a plaintiff's claim, all material factual issues should be included in such interrogatories. Martinez v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 714 F.2d 1028, 1032 (10th Cir.1983). III…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 15, 1985 · in the opinion

    Dartez v. Fibreboard Corp. (1985)

    …industry. His testimony on the state of the art has the same relevance in every asbestos case, regardless of which corporations are the defendants. In view of the commonality of the state of the art issue…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · June 3, 1985 · in the opinion

    Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)

    …Cir.1984); Donovan v. Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers Intern. Union and Its Local 423, 718 F.2d 1341 (5th Cir.1983); Thompson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 714 F.2d 581 (5th Cir.1983); Hargrave…

  10. Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · August 24, 1989 · in the opinion

    District of Columbia v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (1989)

    …of actions commenced by a state after a statute of limitations would ordinarily have run.\[11\] The District of Columbia, however, has never been admitted to the Union as a state. The District is, of course…