58 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 2 of 3
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 31, 1989 · in the opinion
Falk v. Keene Corp. (1989)
…is subject to liability for physical harm thereby caused to the ultimate user ..." This court adopted the strict liability theory of section 402A as to manufacturers in Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wn.2d 522…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion
Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)
…See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir.1986) ("permissible inferences must ... be within the range of reasonable probability") (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · December 9, 1986 · in the opinion
In re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases (1986)
…920(3). This imputed knowledge test is, therefore, clearly not inconsistent with strict products liability. See e.g. Wood v. Ford Motor Co., 71 Or.App. 87, 691 P.2d 495 (1984), rev. den., 298 Or…
-
Court case · Maine Supreme Judicial Court · January 17, 1984 · in the opinion
Austin v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1984)
…second, that such assumption of the risk is a "form of contributory negligence." The first principle finds wide support in the authorities. See Henderson v. Ford Motor Co., 519 S.W.2d 87, 90 (Tex.1974)…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 15, 1987 · in the opinion
Lockwood v. AC & S, Inc. (1987)
…itself and the consumer's expectations. Davis, at 72. Thus, in Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 212-13, 683 P.2d 1097, 47 A.L.R.4th 609 (1984), we held that…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · July 3, 1980 · in the opinion
Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior Court (1980)
…Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1952) 39 Cal.2d 529, 532-533 \[247 P.2d 707\]; Dixon v. Ford Motor Co. (1975) 53 Cal. App.3d 499, 503, 504-507 \[125 Cal. Rptr. 872\]; Wickham v…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 27, 1986 · in the opinion
Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
…of the product he has produced rather than his behavior and, therefore, strict liability does not sound in negligence. (citations omitted). Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wash.2d 208, 212-13, 683 P.2d 1097…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · August 18, 1988 · in the opinion
Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1988)
…Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co., 418 Mich. 311, 343 N.W.2d 164 (1984), and Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co., 140 Mich.App. 19, 363 N.W.2d 721 (1985), cert. denied sub nom. Firestone Tire…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · March 17, 1986 · in the opinion
In re Moorenovich (1986)
…not recover damages for negligently inflicted mental suffering, except in connection with recovery of damages for physical injury caused by the same negligent act." Vicnire v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 401 A.2d 148, 153 (1979)…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · March 27, 1989 · in the opinion
Dube v. Pittsburgh Corning (1989)
…768 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir.1985) (same); Ford v. American Motors Corp., 770 F.2d 465 (5th Cir.1985) (decision of postal service not to warn buyers of surplus vehicles of risk of rollovers was…
-
Medical study · Medical research · 1984
The influence of amosite asbestos exposure on lung permeability
This animal experiment tested whether amosite asbestos changes the barrier between blood and air in the lung. Young adult guinea pigs were given 25 mg of ground amosite in saline into the windpipe. Control animals received saline alone or sham…
-
Medical study · Medical research · 1989
The incidence of malignant mesothelioma in Australia, 1947-1980
This study counted all identifiable malignant mesothelioma cases diagnosed in Australia through 1980. Sources included cancer registries, pathologists and The Australian Mesothelioma Surveillance Program. They identified 674 cases (535 men, 123…
-
Medical study · Medical research · 1985
Early response of the visceral pleura following asbestos exposure: an ultrastructural study
In this laboratory experiment, the authors placed a single 25-mg dose of amosite asbestos in saline directly into the windpipe of young adult guinea pigs. Control animals received saline only. Two exposed animals and one control were examined at…
-
Company document · JM Knowledge Chronology · April 7, 1980
Warren W. Greene to Johns-Manville Sales Corporation on the Nix Compensation Settlement (1980)
…discuss it. In Johns-Manville's chronology Johns-Manville's own chronology of what the company knew describes this document as follows: Letter to Mary B. Walker from Warren W. Greene of Jones, Nelson, Sisk & Ford…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · March 28, 1986
Roehling v. Nat. Gypsum Co. Gold Bond Bldg. (1986)
…Huntley Power Station exposure and remanded for trial, but affirmed summary judgment for Celotex and on the DuPont and Ford plant exposures. Circumstantial evidence that the plaintiff worked in the same area, at the same time…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · August 13, 1982 · in the opinion
Gill v. Pacor, Inc. (1982)
…acts of another: Restatement (Second) of Torts, §§ 442A, 442B. See also, Ford v. Jeffries, 474 Pa. 588, 379 A. 2d 111 (1977). In the matter sub judice, the jury specifically found that Johns-Manville was a…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · September 7, 1983 · in the opinion
Pierce v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)
…JJ. John T. Enoch and John Amato, IV, with whom were Goodman, Meagher & Enoch on the brief, for appellants. F. Ford Loker, with whom were Robert E. Scott, Jr., Daniel W. Whitney and Semmes, Bowen & Semmes…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 1983 · in the opinion
Skip Fordyce, Inc. v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1983)
…Drass & Kelsey, Eugene Leviton, Jones, Nelson, Sisk & Ford and John A. Haley for Respondents. OPINION KAUFMAN, J. The Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) awarded death benefits to the widow of Homer Joe Barry, and the Workers' Compensation…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 5, 1984 · in the opinion
Weinberg v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)
…Robert E. Scott, Jr., Bruce R. Parker, Daniel W. Whitney, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Donald A. Krach, F. Ford Loker, Niles, Barton & Wilmer, Michael B. Mann, Merriman & Mann, James R. Eyler, Miles & Stockbridge, Michael E. Marr, Baltimore…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · January 31, 1986 · in the opinion
Knauer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
…J. Graham and Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, Md., for defendant H.K. Porter. Donald A. Krach, F. Ford Loker, and Niles, Barton & Wilmer, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Keene Corp. Edward C. Mackie, Glenn W. Trimmer…