No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

427 results for “General Electric”, page 22 of 22

  1. Court case · Utah Supreme Court · September 29, 1987 · in the opinion

    Tisco Intermountain v. Industrial Com'n of Utah (1987)

    …to asbestos products from 1971 until his death. Rather, they spoke only in very general terms. When asked if she had any knowledge of the insulation products used by Tisco, Mrs. Werner responded: "Not an awfully…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois · March 25, 1983 · in the opinion

    In re Unr Industries, Inc. (1983)

    …1982, a General Order was adopted by this Court pursuant to which all cases under Title 11 were referred to the bankruptcy judges of this district. The General Order became effective on December 25, 1982. On…

  3. Court case · Ohio Court of Common Pleas · January 12, 1987 · in the opinion

    Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1987)

    …developing cancer in the future. Ohio courts have not specifically addressed the issue presented here but the general policy of this state has been to permit recovery for reasonable apprehension of a potential harm flowing from…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 8, 1982 · in the opinion

    White v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    …However, an occupational disease is not an "injury" that is susceptible of such precise determination since occupational diseases in general are progressive diseases that develop over a long period of time. The symptoms of an occupational…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · November 7, 1983 · in the opinion

    Donovan v. Oil, Chem., and Atom. Workers Intern. (1983)

    …Third Circuit read the specific provision conferring on employees the right to challenge reasonableness of the abatement period as limiting the more general directive to the Commission concerning employee participation "as parties." To support its interpretation…

  6. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · March 6, 1984 · in the opinion

    Copeland v. Celotex Corp. (1984)

    …This defect is the cause of the alleged injury, and in a very general sense its existence must constitute under the respective theories of recovery a breach of a duty, a breach of a warranty and…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 30, 1983 · in the opinion

    Christman v. Dravo Corp. (1983)

    …232, 100 L.Ed. 133 (1956). See Director, OWCP v. Perini North River Associates, supra; Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 443 U.S. 256, 263, 99 S.Ct. 2753, 2757, 61 L.Ed.2d 621 (1979)…