No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

164 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 9 of 9

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · October 1, 1981 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America (1981)

    …than one insurer will be triggered. Because each insurer is fully liable, and because Keene cannot collect more than it owes in damages, the issue of dividing insurance obligations arises. The only logical resolution of this…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · November 7, 1983 · in the opinion

    Donovan v. Oil, Chem., and Atom. Workers Intern. (1983)

    …Circuit's interpretation, the employees' rights are yoked to the status of the employer's participation: even if the notice of contest opens the door to plenary employee participation, once the employer withdraws its notice the…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 31, 1982 · in the opinion

    Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd. (1982)

    …Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Day, Alaska, 594 P.2d 38, 47 (1979); Owen, Punitive Damages in Products Liability Litigation, 74 Mich.L.Rev. 1257, 1277-1299 (1976). See also State ex. rel. Young v. Crookham…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Oregon · December 23, 1988 · in the opinion

    Schmoll v. ACandS, Inc. (1988)

    …defending asbestos litigation. ALM now owns the stock of Raymark Corporation, whose only asset is Raymark Industries' stock. [\872] As a result of this involved corporate restructuring, Raytech now owns WC & B and RIPG, the two…