No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

17 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · April 25, 1989 · in the opinion

    Anjeski v. Keene Bldg. & Development Co. (1989)

    …to a directed verdict because with the former the evidence has yet to be fully developed. See Pierce v. Ford Motor Company, 190 F.2d 910 (CA 4 1951); but see 10 Federal Practice and Procedure…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · December 30, 1982 · in the opinion

    Murphree v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1982)

    …Supreme Court, with Justice William Fones dissenting, prevented the amendment from becoming effective. The Court held in Ford Motor Company v. Moulton, 511 S.W.2d 690 (Tenn.1974) that under Tennessee vested rights doctrine, based…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 10, 1985 · in the opinion

    Kaminski v. Western MacArthur Co. (1985)

    …v. IRM Corporation (1985) 38 Cal.3d 454 \[213 Cal. Rptr. 213, 698 P.2d 116\]; Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256 \[37 Cal. Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168\]; Barth v…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · February 17, 1987 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …and alternative liability in Marshall v. Celotex, 651 F.Supp. 389 (E.D.Mich.1987). \[2\] Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co., 140 Mich.App. 19, 33, 363 N.W.2d 721 (1985) ("\[P\]laintiff is entitled…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · March 1, 1983 · in the opinion

    Carter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)

    …Blickman, Inc. v. Chilton, 114 S.W.2d 646 (Tex.Civ.App. — Austin 1938), no writ; Ford Motor Co. v. Mathis, 322 F.2d 267, 272-74 (5th Cir.1963). These findings, in turn, entailed a…

  6. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 31, 1989 · in the opinion

    Falk v. Keene Corp. (1989)

    …is subject to liability for physical harm thereby caused to the ultimate user ..." This court adopted the strict liability theory of section 402A as to manufacturers in Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wn.2d 522…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir.1986) ("permissible inferences must ... be within the range of reasonable probability") (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 27, 1986 · in the opinion

    Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …of the product he has produced rather than his behavior and, therefore, strict liability does not sound in negligence. (citations omitted). Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wash.2d 208, 212-13, 683 P.2d 1097…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · March 27, 1989 · in the opinion

    Dube v. Pittsburgh Corning (1989)

    …768 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir.1985) (same); Ford v. American Motors Corp., 770 F.2d 465 (5th Cir.1985) (decision of postal service not to warn buyers of surplus vehicles of risk of rollovers was…

  10. Medical study · Medical research · 1989

    The incidence of malignant mesothelioma in Australia, 1947-1980

    This study counted all identifiable malignant mesothelioma cases diagnosed in Australia through 1980. Sources included cancer registries, pathologists and The Australian Mesothelioma Surveillance Program. They identified 674 cases (535 men, 123…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · March 28, 1986

    Roehling v. Nat. Gypsum Co. Gold Bond Bldg. (1986)

    …Huntley Power Station exposure and remanded for trial, but affirmed summary judgment for Celotex and on the DuPont and Ford plant exposures. Circumstantial evidence that the plaintiff worked in the same area, at the same time…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · January 31, 1986 · in the opinion

    Knauer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …J. Graham and Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, Md., for defendant H.K. Porter. Donald A. Krach, F. Ford Loker, and Niles, Barton & Wilmer, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Keene Corp. Edward C. Mackie, Glenn W. Trimmer…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 16, 1987 · in the opinion

    Hughes v. Western MacArthur Co. (1987)

    …Fire Protection Dist. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 148, 153 \[233 Cal. Rptr. 308, 729 P.2d 743\]; Young v. Libbey-Owens Ford Co. (1985) 168 Cal. App.3d 1037, 1040, fn. 3 \[214 Cal. Rptr. 400\…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 13, 1982 · in the opinion

    Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1982)

    …Ford, Bacon & Davis Constr. Corp., 96 Wis.2d 314, 291 N.W.2d 825 (1980). That case involved a suit by the Wisconsin Natural Gas Company to recover damages caused by the negligent installation of a…

  15. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · March 17, 1988 · in the opinion

    Celotex Corp. v. Meehan (1988)

    …the theoretical underpinning of our own discovery rule. As this Court stated thirty years ago in Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Ford: Generally, in actions for personal injuries resulting from the wrongful act or negligence…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 27, 1980 · in the opinion

    Grabowski v. Turner & Newall (1980)

    …Galgon. Q. When was that; when did you see Galgon? A. '78. Q. Did Dr. Ford ever tell you, specifically, that you had problems associated with breathing asbestos? A. Well, he told me, I had asbestosis…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 19, 1984 · in the opinion

    Colombo v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)

    …Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., for Amatex Corp. Lise Luborsky, Duane, Morris & Heckscher, Philadelphia, Pa., for D.A.R. Industrial Products, Inc. Robert St. Leger Goggin, Philadelphia, Pa., for Johns-Manville Corp., Johns-Manville Sales Corp. Edward J…