No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

16 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · April 25, 1989 · in the opinion

    Anjeski v. Keene Bldg. & Development Co. (1989)

    …to a directed verdict because with the former the evidence has yet to be fully developed. See Pierce v. Ford Motor Company, 190 F.2d 910 (CA 4 1951); but see 10 Federal Practice and Procedure…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · October 5, 1981 · in the opinion

    White v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)

    …v. United Fruit Company, 365 U.S. 731, 81 S.Ct. 886, 6 L.Ed.2d 56 (1961); Sanderlin v. Old Dominion Stevedoring Corporation, 385 F.2d 79 (4th Cir. 1967); Ford Motor Company v. Wallenius…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · January 14, 1987 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …defendants should be \jointly and severally' liable." (Plaintiff's Complaint at pp. 7-8). A case decided in the Michigan Court of Appeals subsequent to Abel is Cousineau v. Ford Motor Company, 140 Mich.App. 19…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · May 12, 1987 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)

    …by demonstrating defendants' concerted activity, and proximate cause, by demonstrating that defendants' conduct "was so significant and important a cause that \[defendants\] should be legally responsible." Cousineau v. Ford Motor Company, 140 Mich.App. 19, 35…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 10, 1985 · in the opinion

    Kaminski v. Western MacArthur Co. (1985)

    …v. IRM Corporation (1985) 38 Cal.3d 454 \[213 Cal. Rptr. 213, 698 P.2d 116\]; Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256 \[37 Cal. Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168\]; Barth v…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)

    …protection to a rigidly literal class of "users and consumers." In Ford Motor Co. v. Cockrell, 211 So.2d 833 (Miss.1968), a city employee noticed smoke rising from the motor of an unattended city truck…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · March 1, 1983 · in the opinion

    Carter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)

    …Blickman, Inc. v. Chilton, 114 S.W.2d 646 (Tex.Civ.App. — Austin 1938), no writ; Ford Motor Co. v. Mathis, 322 F.2d 267, 272-74 (5th Cir.1963). These findings, in turn, entailed a…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · January 30, 1986 · in the opinion

    Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1986)

    …of a reasonable and rational nature upon which a jury can make the necessary inference that there is a causal connection between a defendant's action and a plaintiff's injury. In Ford Motor Co. v…

  9. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 31, 1989 · in the opinion

    Falk v. Keene Corp. (1989)

    …is subject to liability for physical harm thereby caused to the ultimate user ..." This court adopted the strict liability theory of section 402A as to manufacturers in Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wn.2d 522…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 28, 1988 · in the opinion

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1163 (4th Cir.1986) ("permissible inferences must ... be within the range of reasonable probability") (quoting Ford Motor Co. v. McDavid, 259 F.2d 261, 266 (4th…

  11. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · October 15, 1987 · in the opinion

    Lockwood v. AC & S, Inc. (1987)

    …itself and the consumer's expectations. Davis, at 72. Thus, in Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wn.2d 208, 212-13, 683 P.2d 1097, 47 A.L.R.4th 609 (1984), we held that…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 27, 1986 · in the opinion

    Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …of the product he has produced rather than his behavior and, therefore, strict liability does not sound in negligence. (citations omitted). Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 102 Wash.2d 208, 212-13, 683 P.2d 1097…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · August 18, 1988 · in the opinion

    Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1988)

    …Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co., 418 Mich. 311, 343 N.W.2d 164 (1984), and Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co., 140 Mich.App. 19, 363 N.W.2d 721 (1985), cert. denied sub nom. Firestone Tire…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · March 27, 1989 · in the opinion

    Dube v. Pittsburgh Corning (1989)

    …768 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir.1985) (same); Ford v. American Motors Corp., 770 F.2d 465 (5th Cir.1985) (decision of postal service not to warn buyers of surplus vehicles of risk of rollovers was…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · March 28, 1986

    Roehling v. Nat. Gypsum Co. Gold Bond Bldg. (1986)

    …Huntley Power Station exposure and remanded for trial, but affirmed summary judgment for Celotex and on the DuPont and Ford plant exposures. Circumstantial evidence that the plaintiff worked in the same area, at the same time…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 13, 1982 · in the opinion

    Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1982)

    …Ford, Bacon & Davis Constr. Corp., 96 Wis.2d 314, 291 N.W.2d 825 (1980). That case involved a suit by the Wisconsin Natural Gas Company to recover damages caused by the negligent installation of a…