10 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · March 15, 1989 · in the opinion
In re Johns-Manville Corp. (1989)
…Thus, pursuant to ¶ 10.1(B) of the Plan and the general power of this Court, the Court retains jurisdiction to determine the instant dispute. The Plan also provides in ¶ 10.1(G) that the Court…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 8, 1987
Swogger v. Waterman SS Corp. (1987)
…contribution and indemnity are not barred by New York's General Obligations Law. Maritime Law and Navy Ships Worksites: engine rooms of some 13 vessels marine engineer engine rooms of some 13 vessels more than 35…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 28, 1984
BD. OF Educ. v. Ambach (1984)
…vacuuming dust did not stop fibers from entering the air. It also held the Commissioner's general powers over education law let him enforce the Act. The court granted summary judgment to the Commissioner and denied…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · October 3, 1989
Swogger v. Waterman SS Corp. (1989)
…on the high seas, admiralty law rather than state law applies to the related third-party contribution and indemnity claims, so New York General Obligations Law § 15-108 does not bar contribution. Fault, Apportionment and Settlement…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · June 13, 1983 · in the opinion
American Home Prod. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. (1983)
…700 F.2d 836, 842 (2d Cir.1983) (rejecting plaintiff's request for general ruling on government's liability for asbestos exposure, although recognizing "staggering" costs of ordering thousands of individual actions). \[7\] The CGL was…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · January 23, 1984 · in the opinion
In re Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)
…at 356 (citations omitted). Thus, the fixation of the point from which to date a statute of limitations includes an assessment of the general need for repose against the need for redress of injury. In contrast…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · May 24, 1989 · in the opinion
Kaufman v. City of New York (1989)
…the DOB. The protection offered by the legislative process satisfies the requirements of procedural due process when the legislature enacts a law, or an agency promulgates a rule, affecting a general class. See, e.g., J…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York · December 7, 1989 · in the opinion
Rummo v. The Celotex Corp. (In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit., 1989)
…Ed. 1188 (1938). But this state's highest courts have not definitively analyzed the issue in published opinions. We turn therefore to the general law of torts, as would New York's highest court. MacPherson v…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · October 29, 1981 · in the opinion
Matter of Steinhardt v. JohnsManville Corp. (1981)
…such claims are diligently and expeditiously pursued. An exception to the general period of limitation rule is required when the pathological effect of an injury occurs without perceptible trauma, and the victim is blamelessly ignorant of…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · March 30, 1988 · in the opinion
Kane v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1988)
…that Kane is a "person aggrieved" by the Bankruptcy Court's order confirming the Plan. As a general rule, creditors have standing to appeal orders of the bankruptcy court disposing of property of the estate because…