No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 30, 1986 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Saif (1986)

    …his claim for medical services. We affirm. During January, 1983, claimant worked at a demolition project in downtown Portland as an electrician. Over the course of two weeks, he was exposed to asbestos dust. Shortly thereafter…

  2. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · March 6, 1981 · in the opinion

    Locke v. Johns-Manville (1981)

    …the defendants in the November 1978 order appealed from. The record shows that since approximately 1948 plaintiff had been employed as an industrial electrician by various contractors at sites in Virginia, New York and North Carolina…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · August 13, 1982 · in the opinion

    Gill v. Pacor, Inc. (1982)

    …services, society. These are the things that are encompassed in the general description or the technical word that we use as "consortium." That is the nature of Mrs. Gill's claim; that by virtue of the…

  4. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court · March 8, 1985 · in the opinion

    Devlin v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1985)

    … 26, provides that the general rules against claim splitting are rendered inapplicable when: (b) The court in the first action has expressly reserved the plaintiff's right to maintain the second action or; (f) it is…

  5. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 19, 1982 · in the opinion

    Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. (1982)

    …Rather, defendants state, the cost "will be borne by the public at large and reflected in a general, across the board increase in premiums to compensate for unanticipated risks." There is some truth in this assertion…

  6. Court case · Maine Supreme Judicial Court · October 15, 1986 · in the opinion

    Bernier v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)

    …is an important limitation of the seller's liability. In general, "\[t\]he rule of strict liability subjects the seller to liability to [\540] the user or consumer even though he has exercised all possible care…