Search

• Decade: 1990s ×
• Organization: Celotex ×
• Clear filters

1 result for “Reaction Department”

1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 17, 1998 · in the opinion

   Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1998)

   …the judge. When the proceedings resumed, the district court reprimanded plaintiffs' counsel. Pittsburgh Corning mentions adverse audience reaction on a couple of occasions, but the district court properly handled those matters. Neither of these occurrences, or…