No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

44 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 3

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · March 23, 1993

    Miller v. American President Lines, Ltd. (1993)

    …suppliers under comparative fault, and otherwise affirmed the judgment for the plaintiff estate. Punitive damages are not available in a general maritime law unseaworthiness action for the wrongful death of a seaman. Indemnity and contribution among…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)

    …Fibreboard, Foster Wheeler, GAF Corporation, Garlock, General Electric, Owens-Illinois, Pittsburgh Corning and Westinghouse were cross-claim defendants. Crane Packing was found not liable and is not involved in this appeal. \[6\] See part III, section…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998 · in the opinion

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    …reach the consumer in the same condition as it left the manufacturer\]; and Artiglio v. General Electric Co. (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 830, 71 Cal.Rptr.2d 817 \[silcone supplier not liable to user of…

  4. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 31, 1995 · in the opinion

    Brewer v. Fibreboard Corp. (1995)

    …Bartells Company; G.K. Technologies, Inc., successor in interest to General Cable Company; General Electric Company; Okonite Company; Westinghouse Electric Corporation; Ericcsson North America, Inc., successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable Company, and successor in…

  5. Court case · California Supreme Court · August 18, 1997 · in the opinion

    Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)

    …of "Kaylo" asbestos insulation to OCF in 1958, has filed an amicus curiae brief in support of defendant OCF. General Electric Company, joined by various defendants in the Lockheed Litigation Cases, Los Angeles Coordination Proceedings No…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 3, 1997 · in the opinion

    Anchor Packing Co. v. Grimshaw (1997)

    …3\] (Emphasis added). In addition, the legislative history of C.J. § 11-108 indicates that the General Assembly intended that the cap apply broadly, as opposed to only malpractice claims. In January 1986, Senate Bill No…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 11, 1995 · in the opinion

    Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995)

    …may be admissible to prove what ordinary consumers of the product actually expect when those expectations are beyond the lay experience common to all jurors. (Soule v. General Motors Corp., supra, 8 Cal.4th at pp…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · January 31, 1990

    Kraciun v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1990)

    …Nemours & Co. plant, Clinton, Iowa Clinton 1953 onward (except Navy 1954-1958); service crew, general maintenance worker and electrical maintenance worker E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. plant, Clinton, Iowa Clinton 1948-1985; maintenance person…

  9. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · April 22, 1998 · in the opinion

    Purcell v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (1998)

    …Bartells Company. With her on the brief was Graff & O'Neil. Robert B. Rocklin, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for cross-respondent Department of Justice, State of Oregon. Before DEITS, C.J.,\[\\] and RIGGS \[\\\] and LANDAU…

  10. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · January 22, 1997 · in the opinion

    Tallman v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn. (1997)

    …on both of them. I. The Facts. Robert Tallman was employed as an electrician on various construction projects when he came in contact with asbestos products used in the construction process. Tallman's asbestos exposure spanned…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 31, 1996 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Baltimore City (1996)

    …were discussed. This file would cover five or six hundred pages, which can be microphotographed in the library of the Surgeon General in Washington or in some other medical library. It is unclear, however, from the…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 6, 1995 · in the opinion

    Harris v. AC & S, Inc. (1995)

    …822 (1971); Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co., 313 U.S. 487, 61 S.Ct. 1020, 85 L.Ed. 1477 (1941); Clarin Corp. v. Massachusetts General Life Ins. Co., 44 F.3d 471, 474 (7th…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 1998 · in the opinion

    Re' v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …J., dissents with reasons. BYRNES, Judge, dissenting with reasons. When the Louisiana Supreme Court in Jordan v. Central Louisiana Electric Co., Inc., 95-1270 (La.6/23/95), 656 So.2d 988, 989 held that the…

  14. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 14, 1996 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Wasiak (1996)

    …reviewing punitive-damage awards and approved the Alabama Supreme Court's criteria, as stated in Green Oil, 539 So.2d at 223-24, and Central Alabama Electric Cooperative v. Tapley, 546 So.2d 371, 377 (Ala…

  15. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · September 12, 1997

    Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)

    …that resulted. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Failure to Warn; Wrongful Death and Survival; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: General Motors Buick plant; General Motors Buick plant, Flint welder General Motors Buick plant Flint 1952-1988

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · July 2, 1990

    White v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

    …The Ninth Circuit affirmed. It held that the defendants' general sale of asbestos insulation during those years was not evidence that they supplied the asbestos Edward encountered. It also found market share liability unsuited to asbestos…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · November 29, 1993

    Angelo v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1993)

    …It upheld exclusion of a treating doctor's deposition because the Angelos had not shown diligent efforts to secure his attendance. It found the reverse bifurcation proper, and the jury instructions and general verdict form adequate.

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 27, 1993 · in the opinion

    Dunn v. Hovic (1993)

    I do not propose to enter the debate here over the merits of punitive damages in general.\[1\] For purposes of this case, I accept the premise that in appropriate cases punitive damages may be assessed…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 14, 1995 · in the opinion

    Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1995)

    …the petit jury venire. The Supreme Court announced a general rule that "\[t\]he denial or impairment of the right \[to exercise peremptory challenges\] is reversible error without a showing of prejudice." Swain, 380 U.S…

  20. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 1992 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson (1992)

    …omitted). See also Ford Motor Co. v. Phelps, 239 Va. 272, 276, 389 S.E.2d 454, 457 (1990); General Motors Corp. v. Lupica, 237 Va. 516, 521, 379 S.E.2d 311, 314 (1989). Additionally…