No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

449 results for “General Electric”, page 19 of 23

  1. Court case · Oregon Supreme Court · July 3, 1997 · in the opinion

    Beneficiaries of Estate of Strametz v. Spectrum (1997)

    …Special Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents on review Spectrum Motorwerks, Inc., and SAIF Corporation. With him on the briefs were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General. Before…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa · November 22, 1994 · in the opinion

    Perrin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    …that the defendants' products were located at shipyards where the Parks was overhauled, and were used by shipyard workers on ships in general, does not support a reasonable inference that the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 23, 1999 · in the opinion

    Lambert v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. (1999)

    …we must address two issues. First, we must assess the general features of the type of incident involved to determine whether the incident had "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce." Id. (quoting Sisson v. Ruby…

  4. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 28, 1997 · in the opinion

    Mavroudis v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1997)

    …evidence or the supposed inadequacies therein, with the single exception of one general objection based on hearsay contained in the declarations of counsel [\693] provided for use at the reasonableness hearing. Even that objection is not…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · October 3, 1995 · in the opinion

    Barnes v. Keene Corp. (1995)

    …S. Hebrank, Burroughs, Hepler, Broom, MacDonald & Hebrank, Edwardsville, IL, for Carey Canada, Incorporated. Michael T. Novak, Office of the Attorney General, Criminal Appeals Division, Springfield, IL, Michael D. Freeborn, Michael J. Higgins, Freeborn & Peters, Chicago, IL…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · September 12, 1994 · in the opinion

    US Gypsum v. Baltimore (1994)

    …defendant's argument that certain deposition testimony was irrelevant as state of the art evidence merely because it was the testimony of an asbestos manufacturer's medical director rather than evidence from the general scientific community…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion

    US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)

    …coverage action when that proof has not yet been established in the underlying action. Courts have addressed these competing concerns by crafting the general rule that if an insured settles an underlying claim prior to verdict…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 5, 1996 · in the opinion

    Dollas v. WR Grace & Co. (1996)

    …that Monokote was not used on The Constellation in the face of unequivocal testimony that it was. A court may only apply judicial notice to matters "of common and general knowledge, well established and authoritatively settled…

  9. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 20, 1992 · in the opinion

    Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (1992)

    …TAMILIA, KELLY and JOHNSON, JJ. [\442] WIEAND, Judge: The general issue in this asbestos exposure action is whether Pennsylvania, in the context of asbestos actions, shall be a one-disease or two-disease state. More specifically…

  10. Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · December 17, 1996 · in the opinion

    United Insurance v. France Refractories (1996)

    …1983). This is consistent with the general rule that a cause of action does not accrue until the time when the plaintiff could have first maintained the cause of action to a successful conclusion. Kapil v…

  11. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 11, 1998 · in the opinion

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …even though both individuals deny it. In any event, plaintiffs do not rely solely upon parallel action to prove their cases. A defendant who understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees…

  12. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · November 15, 1994 · in the opinion

    Matter of Celotex Corp. (1994)

    …107] II. APPLICABLE LAW ON A CONTRACT TERMS USAGE Notwithstanding the general judicial community's consideration of the term "asbestosis," the issue is whether "asbestosis" is an ambiguous term as a matter of law. Applicable law…

  13. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 18, 1994 · in the opinion

    Keystone Steel and Wire Co. v. Costa (1994)

    …689, 485 N.E.2d 500.) In general, a new trial on the question of damages only is appropriately granted where (1) the jury's verdict on the question of liability is amply supported by the…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    …is one of the four plaintiffs in the wrongful death action of Mary Hansen. [\761] (5) "The general rule is that \an appeal reviews the correctness of a judgment as of the time of its rendition…

  15. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 21, 1999 · in the opinion

    McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …could look beyond these problems, I still would not agree with the majority's decision. A defendant is liable as a conspirator where he understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees…

  16. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 23, 1999 · in the opinion

    Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. James (1999)

    …exposure to asbestos. The issue really is the more general one—whether forcing any movant to await final judgment makes the issue of inconvenient forum effectively non-reviewable. Our view as to that was, to some…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · March 15, 1990 · in the opinion

    Associated Industries of Massachusetts v. Snow (1990)

    …Massachusetts Coalition for Occupational Safety and Health; Occupational Health Service of Massachusetts Respiratory Hosp.; Service Employees Intern. Union, AFL-CIO; Massachusetts General Hosp. Occupational Medicine Clinic; Massachusetts Laborers' Dist. Council; Sheet Metal Workers Intern. Ass'n…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · September 13, 1990 · in the opinion

    George v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

    …v. Fuller Brush Co., 378 F.2d 500, 502 (3rd Cir.1967); Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 181 F.2d 70, 82 (7th Cir.1950); remanded on other grounds, 340 U.S. 558, 71…

  19. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 30, 1993 · in the opinion

    Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd. (1993)

    …under Illinois common law. However, Fahner does not represent that conclusion because it involved a statutory enforcement action brought by the Illinois Attorney General pursuant to the Illinois Antitrust Act (Ill.Rev.Stat.1975, ch. 38…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · March 19, 1991 · in the opinion

    Threadgill v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1991)

    …carbon copy of an October 1, 1935 letter from Bridgeport, Connecticut (Raybestos headquarters), to Vandiver Brown, general counsel for Johns-Manville, indicates that the Rossiter letter was enclosed. The copy, while unsigned, contains the word "President…