No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

449 results for “General Electric”, page 21 of 23

  1. Court case · California Supreme Court · January 25, 1999 · in the opinion

    Chevron USA, Inc. v. Wcab (1999)

    …health and safety and general welfare of any and all workers and those dependent upon them for support to the extent of relieving from the consequences of any injury or death incurred or sustained by workers…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995 · in the opinion

    Schiavo v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    …of the videotape. See State v. Wilson, 135 N.J. 4, 17, 637 A.2d 1237 (1994) and Balian v. General Motors, 121 N.J. Super. 118, 125, 296 A.2d 317 (App.Div. 1972), certif…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · May 2, 1991 · in the opinion

    Harding v. Proko Industries, Inc. (1991)

    …find Kansas or Texas law to be applicable to the plaintiff's claims. Section 6(2) of the Second Restatement identifies seven general considerations which are relevant to the resolution of a given conflict of laws…

  4. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 18, 1994 · in the opinion

    Costa v. Dresser Industries, Inc. (1994)

    …246 N.E.2d 269.) The general rule as to statements made by counsel in opening statement that certain evidence will be introduced is that such statements are not improper if made in good faith and…

  5. Court case · Alaska Supreme Court · June 25, 1993 · in the opinion

    Peek v. Skw/clinton (1993)

    …and General Engineering. An administrative law judge denied both claims, but Kelaita appealed only his claim against Triple A. Id. at On remand from an order vacating the judge's ruling, the judge found that General…

  6. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 14, 1998 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Sitz (1998)

    …differently. \ \ \ \ \ \ We have concluded that the preferable approach for dealing with these problems in the federal courts is not to preclude the use of offensive collateral estoppel....The general rule should be that in cases where..…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 21, 1994 · in the opinion

    Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1994)

    …I. Bressman, Budd, Larner, Gross, Rosenbaum, Greenberg and Sade, P.C., Cherry Hill, NJ, for General Reinsurance Corp., etal., third-party defendants. Michael J. Geraghty, Sean R. Kelly, David D'Aloia, Saiber, Schlesinger, Satz & Goldstein, Newark…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 23, 1996 · in the opinion

    Kellogg v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (1996)

    …two statutes, a court must construe the statutes in the context of the entire statutory system of which they are a part in order to achieve harmony with other statutes on the same general subject. This…

  9. Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · March 6, 1997 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Henkel (1997)

    …was rendered untimely by the enactment of Section 12-311. OCF acknowledges that "the general purpose underlying Section 12-311 was to expand the period of time in which plaintiffs could sue to recover for asbestos…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 22, 1994 · in the opinion

    Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    …state that he saw OCF's name on Kaylo boxes at the shipyard. But the questioning reverted back to general product trade names, and Durham was asked the time period that Kaylo products were customarily used…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 4, 1999 · in the opinion

    Ehret v. Congoleum Corp. (1999)

    …pp. 371-372.) There is insufficient basis for deviating from this general rule in the current posture of this case, particularly where to do so would require the taking of evidence. \[4\] Congoleum also appeals from…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 14, 1994 · in the opinion

    Coates v. AC and S, Inc. (1994)

    …599 So.2d at 1062 n. 13. \[10\] Johnstone was a case under the general maritime law which adopted Louisiana law as the law of the adjacent state. \[11\] Defendants contend that the use of OSHA…

  13. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 5, 1998 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Malone (1998)

    …awards by holding that procedural safeguards provide all the protection that is necessary. See, e.g., Scheufler v. General Host Corp., 126 F.3d 1261, 1272 (10 th Cir.1997); Cathey v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.…

  14. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · February 15, 1994 · in the opinion

    Davies v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1994)

    …knowledge with him as a member of the board of directors of OI. The adverse exception of the general rule is not applicable in this case. Ames was not acting solely for his own personal benefit…

  15. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · August 3, 1993 · in the opinion

    Clayton Center Assoc. v. WR Grace & Co. (1993)

    …endanger the health of workers, office employees, and the general public." Their concern included "future demolition of buildings that will release asbestos or other materials into the atmosphere." An August, 1970 memorandum, in which one of…

  16. Court case · Massachusetts Appeals Court · December 11, 1997 · in the opinion

    Thayer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation (1997)

    …Mass. App. Ct. 423, 427 (1981). See also Swartz v. General Motors Corp., 375 Mass. 628, 631 (1978) (privity a valid defense where sale and injury both occurred prior to 1973); Mansfield v. GAF Corp., 5…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · May 3, 1995 · in the opinion

    Rohrbaugh v. Celotex Corp. (1995)

    …the product left the Defendant's possession and control, and that the defect made the product unreasonably dangerous. Kirkland v. General Motors Corp., 521 P.2d 1353, 1363 (Okla.1974). The "unreasonably dangerous" prong of this…

  18. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 25, 1998 · in the opinion

    Breaux v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (1998)

    …Civ. C. arts. 3071-3083 govern the contract of transaction or compromise. These special rules do not modify or depart from the general principles concerning the object of contracts. La.C.C. arts. 1915, 1916. A…

  19. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · February 27, 1992 · in the opinion

    Stevenson v. Keene Corp. (1992)

    …mid 1980's, concern over the insurance industry and tort litigation prompted many reports on both a national and state level. See United States Attorney General's Tort Policy Working Group, Report on the Causes, Extent…

  20. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 31, 1992 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Gardner (1992)

    …cases alleging design defect, the fact finder must consider the product's utility and the risk involved in its use. Turner v. General Motors Corp., 584 S.W.2d 844, 847 see Boatland of Houston, Inc…