No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

449 results for “General Electric”, page 22 of 23

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · May 26, 1992 · in the opinion

    Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1992)

    …Appellants answered with a general denial that their products were defective and that they were negligent. The case was tried to a jury and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the Plaintiffs and against…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · September 19, 1994 · in the opinion

    Lesnick v. Hollingsworth & Vose Co. (1994)

    …it "bound itself to work in virtual partnership with Lorillard to develop a filter for general distribution through integration into Lorillard's cigarettes." Lesnick contended that Hollingsworth & Vose should be imputed with Lorillard's clearly adequate…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 28, 1995 · in the opinion

    Consorti v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1995)

    …s fees to fight asbestos litigation cases." The district court ruled that any well-informed citizen could possess general knowledge about Johns-Manville and that the report from the juror was not prejudicial to the defendants…

  4. Court case · Alabama Court of Civil Appeals · September 24, 1999 · in the opinion

    Wilkerson v. Burlington Northern RR Company (1999)

    …not sufficient to warrant making a diagnosis of pulmonary asbestosis." Dr. Shelton's medical records reflect that Wilkerson had obtained an annual general physical examination from him over the past 10 years, and they indicated Dr…

  5. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 13, 1998 · in the opinion

    Beaudrie v. Anchor Packing Co. (1998)

    …scheme, which is "to provide the opportunity for full recovery by each and thereby place the liability for the injury and the resulting cost upon the negligent party." Franges v. General Motors Corp., 404 Mich. 590…

  6. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · July 1, 1998 · in the opinion

    Ganske v. Spahn & Rose Lumber Co. (1998)

    …100 (Iowa 1983). One workers' compensation authority has noted that, if an injury is, in general, compensable under workers' compensation, a worker who does not actually realize the benefits because of the specific facts of that…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 11, 1998 · in the opinion

    McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …wages. \[4\] In Simmons, the supreme court noted a limited exception to the general rule that a plaintiff does not have a viable cause of action for asymptomatic pleural thickening. This exception recognizes that a plaintiff…

  8. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · February 2, 1993 · in the opinion

    Harashe v. Flintkote Co. (1993)

    …provided for the assumption of liabilities actual and contingent and the peripheral issue of choice of laws. The elements of a de facto merger are: (1) a continuation of management and personnel and general business operations…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 8, 1990 · in the opinion

    Barnett v. City of Yonkers (1990)

    …News 1426, 1428. In the Asbestos Act, Congress directed the Attorney General of the United States to ascertain the feasibility of recovering "from any person determined" to be liable the costs of detecting, removing, and replacing…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 22, 1998 · in the opinion

    Rareshide v. Mobil Oil Corp. (1998)

    …attack. Dr. Gary Menszer, a board-certified cardiologist, admitted the claimant to East Jefferson General Hospital in August, 1995, following his heart attack. After performing a balloon angioplasty of the circumflex for this heart attack, Dr…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 30, 1994 · in the opinion

    Williamson v. Plant Insulation Co. (1994)

    …The proceedings here had not reached that stage when Wash Williamson died. (4) "The general rule is that \courts have inherent power to enter judgments nunc pro tunc so as to relate back to the time…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · July 12, 1995 · in the opinion

    US v. Trident Seafoods Corp. (1995)

    …1988. In 1992, the United States sued Trident and its general contractor and subcontractor for violations of the asbestos regulations governing the removal of asbestos from its facility. These violations included four work practice violations and…

  13. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion

    Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd. (1994)

    …the theory of civil conspiracy. (Restatement (Second) of Torts § 876, Comment c on Clause (a) (1977).) A defendant who understands the general objectives of the conspiratorial scheme, accepts them, and agrees, either explicitly or implicitly to…

  14. Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · April 6, 1999 · in the opinion

    Tester v. American Standard, Inc. (1999)

    …604.02, subd. 3 (1998), provides an exception to this general rule and allows an at-fault plaintiff to recover from a less-at-fault defendant in products liability cases. Section 604.02, subdivision 3, provides…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · June 15, 1998 · in the opinion

    Consorti v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (In Re Joint Eastern and Southern Dist. Asbestos, 1998)

    …as a mechanical formula, awards based on the number of months of suffering \[have been\] criticized ..., it nevertheless represents a general pattern to the New York cases." Id. The Dollas court, nonetheless, rejected the simplistic monthly…

  16. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 9, 1991 · in the opinion

    Thacker v. Unr Industries, Inc. (1991)

    …In a comprehensive opinion, this court discussed and applied a combination of the general substantial-factor test of causation and the "frequency, regularity and proximity test" and the "fiber-drift" theory which involved causation of asbestos…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 8, 1991 · in the opinion

    Kulzer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1991)

    …On appeal from the judgment subsequently entered, OCF offers four general challenges: (1) the district court erred in denying its initial motion for a directed verdict and later motion to dismiss the complaint; (2) the district…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · March 30, 1992 · in the opinion

    Borman v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1992)

    …persons with a significant smoking history\] as compared with the non-smokers and ... the non-asbestos exposed folks in the general population? A Up to 12 — up to 12 to 15 times the group you compared…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · June 19, 1991 · in the opinion

    Cochran v. EI DuPont de Nemours (1991)

    …2552-53, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). II. Federal Admiralty and General Maritime Jurisdiction The judicial power of the United States extends to "all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction." U.S. Const. Art. III…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    King v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1990)

    …the Raybestos-Manhattan Corporation from 1929 to 1953. The "Sumner Simpson papers" consist of correspondence between Simpson and the general counsel for Johns-Manville during the years 1935-1939. The papers tend to show awareness of…