Search

• Decade: 1990s ×
• Clear filters

449 results for “General Electric”, page 23 of 23

1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 18, 1990 · in the opinion

   Howell v. Celotex Corp. (1990)

   …result of being exposed to asbestos?....\[I\]t is my understanding that there was a general agreement he suffered a pleural thickening as a result of his asbestos exposure. Now, I heard one counsel say to…

2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 12, 1996 · in the opinion

   Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Schmidt (1996)

   …of the fee against the two minor Schmidt children. Schmidt argues taxing costs against the minor plaintiffs was error because the record does not show good cause for disregarding the general requirement of TEX.R. CIV…

3. Court case · Utah Court of Appeals · October 16, 1992 · in the opinion

   Luckau v. Board of Review (1992)

   …to articulate the plausible interpretations of the specific language actually used by the legislature in section 14, rather than focus on general policy considerations, it would find that section 14 is not ambiguous.\[2\] ANALYSIS Plain…

4. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 16, 1992 · in the opinion

   Bowers v. Fibreboard Corporation (1992)

   …admitted all but one of the books into evidence, apparently under a then existing exception to the hearsay rule for treatises dealing with events of general history. Appellants challenged the trial court's exclusion of the…

5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 29, 1997 · in the opinion

   Mtr. OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (1997)

   …attributed to the settling defendants would have been increased and that of Carey correspondingly decreased. Such a result would clearly be damaging to the plaintiffs by reason of the application of General Obligations Law § 15-108…

6. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · September 21, 1992 · in the opinion

   Thacker v. Unr Industries, Inc. (1992)

   …44 Ill.2d at 405, 256 N.E.2d 6. As is the general rule in civil cases, the plaintiff has the burden of producing evidence sufficient to establish each element of his or her claim.

7. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · February 17, 1999 · in the opinion

   Sears Roebuck and Co. v. Noppert (1999)

   …to harmonize the provisions of a statute and give effect to all of its provisions, or save it from unconstitutionality or, in general, to effect the obvious intention of the legislature." (emphasis in original)); Dague v…

8. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 4, 1991 · in the opinion

   Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc. (1991)

   …344, 348, 693 P.2d 687 (1985): In an ordinary personal injury action, the general rule is that a cause of action "accrues" at the time the act or omission occurs. In certain torts, however, injured…

9. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 21, 1995 · in the opinion

   Baumgart v. Keene Bldg. Products Corp. (1995)

   …835 (1967). However, we have long recognized an exception to this general rule which acts to toll the running of the limitations period. The discovery rule "provides that where the existence of the injury is not…