No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

30 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998

    Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)

    …of Special Appeals reversed the judgment for Mrs. Wood against Ford Motor Company for insufficient proof that her husband was exposed to Ford's brake and clutch products, and affirmed the judgment for the Grewe plaintiffs…

  2. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · February 20, 1996

    Estate of Orecny v. Ford Motor Co. (1996)

    The appeals court reversed the trial court's order granting Ford Motor Company's Civ.R. 60(B) motion to vacate the settlement, held that the settlement did not abate on the widow's death, and…

  3. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 13, 1998

    Beaudrie v. Anchor Packing Co. (1998)

    …exposure during his employment. The husbands had already received workers' compensation benefits from their employers (Detroit Edison, Ford and Johnson Controls), and a state dust disease fund had reimbursed part of those benefits. The employers and…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · April 3, 1992 · in the opinion

    Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)

    …in Burke, supra, leave no doubt that the actual knowledge standard applies to this case. See also: Tunis Brothers Company, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, 952 F.2d 715, 740 (3d Cir.1991). Thus, to recover…

  5. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · February 2, 1993 · in the opinion

    Harashe v. Flintkote Co. (1993)

    …Ackerman v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Company, 368 S.W.2d 469 (Mo.1963) \[4,5\]. W.R. Grace has successor liability for the liabilities of Zonolite. See, id.; Ernst v. Ford Motor Company, 813 S.W…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 5, 1997 · in the opinion

    Ciletti v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)

    …and a reasonable person would conclude that the utility of the product did not outweigh the risk inherent in marketing a product designed in that manner." Denny v. Ford Motor Company, 87 N.Y.2d 248…

  7. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · January 8, 1998 · in the opinion

    Fuller-Austin Insulation Co. v. Bilder (1998)

    …covered with asbestos dust which ultimately caused Kay's death. Recovery under the strict liability doctrine is not limited to users and consumers. Darryl v. Ford Motor Co., 440 S.W.2d 630, 633 (Tex.1969)…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · May 15, 1998 · in the opinion

    Porter Hayden v. Bullinger (1998)

    …a\]ny agreement between some, but not all, of the litigants should be disclosed upon the request of any party in accordance with our rules of procedure"); Ford Motor Co. v. Leggat, 904 S.W.2d…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    …in light of the evidence before it. (Ford Motor Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America (1995) 35 Cal. App.4th 604, 610 \[41 Cal. Rptr.2d 342\] (Ford).) Therefore, OC bore the burden of proving…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of North Dakota · March 28, 1990 · in the opinion

    Puppe By Puppe v. AC and S., Inc. (1990)

    …955 (N.D.Tex. 1978) ($10 million punitive damage award overturned by court); Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 174 Cal.Rptr. 348 (1981) (upheld trial court's reduction in punitive damage…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)

    …s verdicts if at all possible. See Wagner v. International Harvester Co., 611 F.2d 224 (8th Cir.1979); Hasson v. Ford Motor Co., 19 Cal.3d 530, 138 Cal. Rptr. 705, 564 P.2d 857 …

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 25, 1991 · in the opinion

    Moran v. G. & WH Corson, Inc. (1991)

    …id., and "view trade relations realistically rather than mythically." Verge v. Ford Motor Co., 581 F.2d 384 (3rd Cir.1978). Thus in determining who may be "primarily responsible" [\125] and required to indemnify in a…

  13. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 1992 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson (1992)

    …984, 989, 128 S.E.2d 273, 277 (1962) (citations omitted). See also Ford Motor Co. v. Phelps, 239 Va. 272, 276, 389 S.E.2d 454, 457 (1990); General Motors Corp. v. Lupica, 237 Va…

  14. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 5, 1998 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Malone (1998)

    …W.2d at 30. Once the defendant does so, information which might otherwise be irrelevant and not subject to discovery becomes both relevant and discoverable. See generally Ford Motor Co. v. Leggat, 904 S.W.2d…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998 · in the opinion

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    …in a position to exert pressure on the manufacturer to that end; the retailer's strict liability thus serves as an added incentive to safety." (Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 262…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · March 23, 1998 · in the opinion

    McClain v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …International Armament Corp., 17 F.3d 992, 995 (7th Cir.1994); Barron v. Ford Motor Co. of Can., 965 F.2d 195, 198-99 (7th Cir.1992). Owens-Corning bears "an onerous burden \because a reviewing…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 3, 1998 · in the opinion

    Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (1998)

    …59 Cal.2d 57, 27 Cal.Rptr. 697, 377 P.2d 897, and Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 37 Cal.Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168.) Viad reasons, "Because we find…

  18. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 11, 1996 · in the opinion

    ACandS Inc. v. Asner (1996)

    …al. No. 92, Sept. Term 1995. October 11, 1996. Opinion Denying Reconsideration December 6, 1996. Court of Appeals of Maryland. [\252] B. Ford Davis (Dwight W. Stone, II, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, L.L.P., on brief…

  19. Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · May 20, 1992 · in the opinion

    Baione v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1992)

    …1976). When a set of facts will support both a theory of common law negligence and strict liability, a plaintiff is entitled to proceed on either theory or both. Ford Motor Co. v. Hill, 404 So…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 17, 1998 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1998)

    …we are not persuaded that reversible error has been demonstrated or that manifest injustice would result by allowing the verdict to stand. See Johnson v. Ford Motor Co., 988 F.2d 573, 582 (5th Cir.1993)…