No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

25 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 3, 1998 · in the opinion

    Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (1998)

    …230, 67 S.Ct. 1146, 91 L.Ed. 1447.) Accordingly, "\[p\]reemption fundamentally is a question of congressional intent." (English v. General Electric Co. (1990) 496 U.S. 72, 78-79, 110 S.Ct. 2270, 110…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998 · in the opinion

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    …reach the consumer in the same condition as it left the manufacturer\]; and Artiglio v. General Electric Co. (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 830, 71 Cal.Rptr.2d 817 \[silcone supplier not liable to user of…

  3. Court case · California Supreme Court · August 18, 1997 · in the opinion

    Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)

    …of "Kaylo" asbestos insulation to OCF in 1958, has filed an amicus curiae brief in support of defendant OCF. General Electric Company, joined by various defendants in the Lockheed Litigation Cases, Los Angeles Coordination Proceedings No…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion

    Smith v. ACandS, Inc. (1994)

    …The specifications provide that the contractor is to comply with all safety regulations and eliminate hazards to its own and other workers and that all work is subject to general supervision and inspection by PG&E…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 19, 1999 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Metalclad Insulation Corp. (1999)

    General Motors Corp., supra, 40 Cal.App.4th at p. 356, 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 580; Barr v. ACandS, Inc., supra, 57 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1049-1053, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 494.) The issue…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 11, 1995 · in the opinion

    Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995)

    …may be admissible to prove what ordinary consumers of the product actually expect when those expectations are beyond the lay experience common to all jurors. (Soule v. General Motors Corp., supra, 8 Cal.4th at pp…

  7. Court case · California Supreme Court · August 28, 1997 · in the opinion

    Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997)

    …contained both amosite and chrysotile asbestos fibers. John McKinley, who worked as an electrician at Mare Island, recalled working with Rutherford in the early 1950's. He testified that Rutherford and he were often required to…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion

    Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)

    …were not dangerous. There was concern about the dustiness of Armaspray — but not so much for health reasons as for reasons of cleanup and potential damage to electrical equipment. The specifications for Armaspray called for good…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 21, 1999

    General Dynamics Corp. v. Wcab (1999)

    …res judicata either way, and remanded for an order denying reconsideration without prejudice to General Dynamics raising res judicata later. Res judicata does not bar a workers' compensation claim for a different injury, and a prior…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 19, 1997

    Barr v. ACandS, Inc. (1997)

    …2, allows suit within one year after disability. Following Darden v. General Motors, the Court of Appeal held that filing the first suit started the one-year period for all potentially responsible defendants, named or not…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 27, 1990

    Chevron USA v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1990)

    …mesothelioma was not an outgrowth of the asbestosis. It also held that a 1986 California Supreme Court case, General Foundry, did not require a single date of injury. It denied the family's request for attorney…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 1990

    Uram v. Abex Corp. (1990)

    …run long before 1987. For Virginia's consortium claim, the court applied the general one-year statute with a discovery rule. It found she should likewise have suspected the cause in 1976, so her claim was…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 17, 1995 · in the opinion

    Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995)

    …the court was confronted with a complicated claim that General Motors' defective design of the wheel assembly and front floorboard enhanced the injuries the plaintiff suffered when another car collided with the left front wheel area…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 1995 · in the opinion

    Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995)

    …914 F.2d 360, 372-373, 383.) Other cases dispense entirely with evidence of where a product was used by merely requiring proof that it was in general use at an industrial facility. Thus, Martin v…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1999 · in the opinion

    Howard v. Owens Corning (1999)

    …emotional distress, intentional tort, conspiracy [\389] and loss of consortium; and sought general, special and punitive damages against no fewer than 215 named defendants and 300 unnamed does. Specifically, the complaint alleged that as a result…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 12, 1999 · in the opinion

    Overly v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. (1999)

    …Mississippi. Their general theory of negligence is that Ingalls knew or should have known about the dangers of asbestos and nevertheless exposed Robert to those dangers without providing any warning or protection. I. Exposure and causation…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 27, 1998 · in the opinion

    Petrini v. Mohasco Corp. (1998)

    …70\]. Mohasco asserts New York cases are in accord, citing Grant-Howard Associates v. General Housewares (1984) 63 N.Y.2d 291 \[482 N.Y.S.2d 225, 472 N.E.2d 1\]; Mitchell v. Suburban…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1998 · in the opinion

    Gutierrez v. Cassiar Mining Corp. (1998)

    …fault, warnings Cassiar placed on its product, general knowledge by asbestos workers (by the early 1970's) of asbestos exposure risks, and preexisting lung conditions caused by Gutierrez having smoked and had exposure to tuberculosis (TB)…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 1996 · in the opinion

    Jenkins v. T & N Plc (1996)

    …defendants, including T&N. The complaint contained causes of action for strict liability and loss of consortium. In addition to general and special damages, the Jenkinses sought damages for loss of earnings, income and earning capacity. ...…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996 · in the opinion

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    …is one of the four plaintiffs in the wrongful death action of Mary Hansen. [\761] (5) "The general rule is that \an appeal reviews the correctness of a judgment as of the time of its rendition…