No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

9 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 7, 1998 · in the opinion

    ACandS v. Abate (1998)

    The Western Electric plant was comprised of several buildings and was approximately three miles long and one-and-one-quarter miles deep. Morrow indicated that he worked primarily in the wire insulation building until he became…

  2. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · January 22, 1997 · in the opinion

    Tallman v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn. (1997)

    …on both of them. I. The Facts. Robert Tallman was employed as an electrician on various construction projects when he came in contact with asbestos products used in the construction process. Tallman's asbestos exposure spanned…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · July 23, 1993 · in the opinion

    Maiorana v. United States Mineral Prods. Co. (In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit., 1993)

    …in which HRH complained that the general contractor was not cleaning up the dust from the asbestos spraying. Although Castagna dismisses the examples of constructive notice as "these obscure references" which are "wholly insufficient as a…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · April 3, 1992 · in the opinion

    Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)

    …the court must consider all evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. White v. Westinghouse Electric Company, 862 F.2d 56, 59 (3d Cir.1988). Evidentiary issues Defendants contend that: (1) plaintiff…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · April 6, 1995 · in the opinion

    Maiorana v. United States Mineral Prods. Co. (In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit., 1995)

    …479 (1986). \[4\] Bjorn Hilt et al., Asbestos Exposure, Smoking Habits, and Cancer Incidence Among Production and Maintenance Workers in an Electrochemical Plant, 8 AM.J.INDUS.MED. 565, 571 (1985). \[5\] The court pointed out…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 1994 · in the opinion

    Tabolt v. Flintkote Co. (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1994)

    …at 982 F.2d 721 (2d Cir.1992), and the publication of numerous stories in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal — any well-informed citizen could possess general knowledge about Johns Manville, c.f.…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 5, 1996 · in the opinion

    Dollas v. WR Grace & Co. (1996)

    …that Monokote was not used on The Constellation in the face of unequivocal testimony that it was. A court may only apply judicial notice to matters "of common and general knowledge, well established and authoritatively settled…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · September 8, 1994 · in the opinion

    Peerman v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (1994)

    …court found that, although Mrs. Peerman had produced evidence that Georgia-Pacific's Ready Mix Joint Compound and T & N's Limpet were used at the same general work site where Mr. Peerman worked, she had…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 8, 1990 · in the opinion

    Barnett v. City of Yonkers (1990)

    …News 1426, 1428. In the Asbestos Act, Congress directed the Attorney General of the United States to ascertain the feasibility of recovering "from any person determined" to be liable the costs of detecting, removing, and replacing…