No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

22 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · January 18, 1995

    Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995)

    Frances Consorti and her husband John sued Owens-Corning Fiberglas and others over John's mesothelioma. The opinion says he was exposed to asbestos between 1960 and 1970, married Frances in 1976, and was diagnosed in…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · June 15, 1998

    Consorti v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (In Re Joint Eastern and Southern Dist. Asbestos, 1998)

    The court granted Owens Corning's motion for a new trial unless Consorti accepts a reduced pain and suffering award of $5 million (a $7 million remittitur), and denied Owens Corning's request to cut the…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · November 22, 1995

    Zalinka v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1995)

    The appellate court affirmed the judgment entered on the jury verdict for plaintiffs John Zalinka and his wife against Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, which lost its appeal. Where plaintiffs show liability of a nonsettling defendant, the…

  4. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · October 24, 1995

    Consorti v. Owens Corning (1995)

    …York Court of Appeals answered the Second Circuit's certified question in the negative, so Frances Consorti had no loss of consortium claim against Owens-Corning, which prevailed on that question. In toxic substance exposure cases…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · August 8, 1991

    Kulzer v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1991)

    The Second Circuit reversed the judgment for the plaintiff against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, because the revival statute's exception applied. Under New York's 1986…

  6. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · August 3, 1994

    In re Keene Corp. (1994)

    Dorothy Richter sued Keene Corporation and other asbestos manufacturers in New Jersey state court over her husband's death. The suit alleged he developed mesothelioma through occupational exposure to asbestos. A jury awarded $300,000 for wrongful…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 1994

    Tabolt v. Flintkote Co. (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1994)

    Four men with pleural mesothelioma, or their spouses, sued several asbestos companies in federal court in New York. They were Vincent Tabolt, John Consorti, Alfred Luchnick and Peter Pulizzi. Tabolt worked at a farm cooperative and was said to have…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · April 16, 1990 · in the opinion

    Simpson v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1990)

    …E. SIMPSON, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of David Simpson, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Owens-Illinois, Inc., The Celotex Corporation, Intergy…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · November 5, 1997 · in the opinion

    Ciletti v. Raymark Indus. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 1997)

    …part, Consorti v. Armstrong World Indust., Inc., 72 F.3d 1003 (2d Cir.1995), vacated, Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., \_\_\_ U.S. \_\_\_, 116 S.Ct. 2576, 135 L.Ed.2d 1091 (1996), on remand, Consorti…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · July 23, 1993 · in the opinion

    Maiorana v. United States Mineral Prods. Co. (In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit., 1993)

    …individually and successor-in-interest to Keasbey-Mattison Company; Raymark Industries, Inc.; individually and as successor-in-interest to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.; Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.; U.S. Mineral Products Company; H.K. Porter Company, Inc.…

  11. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · November 30, 1990 · in the opinion

    In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit. (1990)

    …Gene Locks of the firm of Greitzer & Locks, the latter having taken part in the evidentiary hearings but not in the preparation of briefs. (3) Codefendant Owens-Corning Fiberglas, represented by the firms of Debevoise & Plimpton…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · April 1, 1996 · in the opinion

    Buckley v. Metro-North Commuter RR (1996)

    …565 F.Supp. 1553, 1560 (N.D.Ill.1983) (prenatal exposure to DES is a physical impact); Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 30 Ohio Misc.2d 11, 14, 507 N.E.2d 476, 480 (Com…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · February 9, 1993 · in the opinion

    Didner v. Keene Corp. (1993)

    …release of Manville or a discontinuance of the action with prejudice, in distinction to the stipulations and orders in the record covering other defendants, including Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and General Electric, with whom plaintiff did…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 5, 1996 · in the opinion

    Dollas v. WR Grace & Co. (1996)

    …the testimony (Rivera v City of New York, 212 AD2d 403, 404). As we recently noted in Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (219 AD2d 557, 559-560), "Supreme Court's conclusion that plaintiff's allegations…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 29, 1998 · in the opinion

    Ronsini v. Worthington Corp. (Matter Of New York City Asbestos Litigation. Elaine Ronsini V. Garlock, Inc., 1998)

    …settling defendants (see, Bigelow v Acands, Inc., 196 AD2d 436; Zalinka v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 221 AD2d 830, 831), and we decline to disturb the jury's determination as to this, and as to the…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · July 21, 1992 · in the opinion

    Kreppein v. Celotex Corp. (1992)

    …Inc., individually and as successor to Southern Textile Corporation and Southern Asbestos Company; Fibreboard Corporation; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to Unarco Industries; United States Gypsum Company; Raymark Industries…

  17. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 14, 1994 · in the opinion

    Matter of Midland Ins. Co. (1994)

    …not persuasive. These policies are so awkwardly drafted, with regard to the relevant language, that it is no wonder that ambiguity has been discerned\[5\] (see, Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v Travelers Indem. Co., No. 84-3985…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York · May 21, 1990

    Kreppein v. Owens-Illinois (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1990)

    The court granted Owens-Illinois' motion for reconsideration, held the widow's claims against it barred by collateral estoppel, and vacated the judgment as to it; it denied the JNOV, new trial and remittitur motions of…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 26, 1990

    Raney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1990)

    …Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment of about $450,000 for the widow, Edna Raney, against Owens-Illinois, Celotex and Raymark, holding the evidence let the jury find the missing asbestos warnings were a proximate…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · December 29, 1998 · in the opinion

    Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc. (1998)

    …426 F.2d 205, 211 (2d Cir.1970). Here, Plaintiff concedes that Atlas has no offices or owns no real estate in New York, that it maintains no bank accounts in this state, and that it…