12 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · January 19, 1994
Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)
The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed the judgment for Marilyn Spaur and her husband's estate against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, including compensatory, loss of consortium and punitive damages. Asbestos plaintiffs may prove causation under a flexible substantial…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 21, 1995
Jadlowski v. Owens Corning (1995)
The Appellate Division reversed the punitive damages award (as remitted to $2,500,000 from a $15,000,000 jury verdict) against Owens-Corning and remanded for a new trial on punitive damages, rejecting the plaintiff…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa · July 16, 1998
Harder v. ACandS, Inc. (1998)
Oscar Harder worked from 1956 to 1989 as a utility worker for Iowa Public Service. His duties included maintenance at several power plants, among them overhauling General Electric steam turbines. Each overhaul began with removing thermal asbestos…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 19, 1997
Potter v. Patterson (1997)
The widow and children of John Potter sued Mine Safety Appliances (MSA) and many other companies and individuals. They alleged he died of mesothelioma from asbestos exposure over many years of work for NOPSI. The plaintiffs settled with MSA alone…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · June 9, 1999 · in the opinion
Harder v. ACandS (1999)
…were not permanent additions to or betterment of real property before or during their attachment to duct work and boilers. See Buttz v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 557 N.W.2d 90, 91-92 (Iowa 1996)…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · April 16, 1990 · in the opinion
Simpson v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1990)
…E. SIMPSON, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of David Simpson, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Owens-Illinois, Inc., The Celotex Corporation, Intergy…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 19, 1994 · in the opinion
Hartman v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1994)
…spotless. Only defendant's knowledge of the hazardousness of asbestos and how and when that knowledge was revealed to the defendant was relevant. See Kochan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1993), 242 Ill.App.3d 781…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 11, 1999 · in the opinion
North American Refractory Co. v. Easter (1999)
…asbestos that was uniformly distributed throughout the product. In finding sufficient evidence of exposure in an asbestos case, the Alabama Supreme Court in Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So.2d 443, 456 (Ala.1992)…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · May 25, 1993 · in the opinion
Malcolm v. National Gypsum Co. (1993)
…Corporation, individually and as successor to Empire Asbestos Company; Nicolet, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Keasbey- Mattison Company; Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.; W.R. Grace and Co.; H.K. Porter Company, Inc., individually…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · July 21, 1992 · in the opinion
Kreppein v. Celotex Corp. (1992)
…Inc., individually and as successor to Southern Textile Corporation and Southern Asbestos Company; Fibreboard Corporation; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to Unarco Industries; United States Gypsum Company; Raymark Industries…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · February 26, 1990
Raney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1990)
…Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment of about $450,000 for the widow, Edna Raney, against Owens-Illinois, Celotex and Raymark, holding the evidence let the jury find the missing asbestos warnings were a proximate…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion
Smith v. ACandS, Inc. (1994)
…another contractor working on the premises. On the first point, [\95] Smith's argument against retroactivity has recently been rejected by the Fifth District. (Owens v. Giannetta-Heinrich Construction Co. (1994) 23 Cal. App.4th 1662 \…