No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

2 results for “Reaction Department”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 1994 · in the opinion

    Tabolt v. Flintkote Co. (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1994)

    Flintkote's argument that this procedure provides a double recovery for inflation was rejected after thorough attention by the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, Fourth Department, in Brown v. State, 184 A.D…

  2. Court case · West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals · November 15, 1996 · in the opinion

    Marlin v. Bill Rich Const., Inc. (1996)

    …at 166 (citations omitted). In addition, the Court observed that "\[t\]he reasonableness of the plaintiff's reaction to the event will normally be a jury question." Id. at 491, 425 S.E.2d at 167…