8 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · Michigan Supreme Court · July 25, 2007 · in the opinion
In re Certified Question From the Fourteenth District Court OF Appeals OF Texas (2007)
…supra at 233. The court held that because there was no relationship between the defendant and the defendant's employee's wife, no duty could be imposed. In Adams v Owens-Illinois, Inc, 119 Md App…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion
Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)
…asbestos products in Indiana and California. He contends that the trial court erroneously split the cause of action into California and Indiana components, contrary to statements by our Supreme Court in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 24, 2002 · in the opinion
Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co. (2002)
…its discretion. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corporation v. Powell, supra. Reversible Error, Directed Verdict, and Illinois Law Having found error, we must next determine if the error is reversible. TEX. R.APP.P. 44.1. An error…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · October 31, 2008 · in the opinion
Kummer v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)
…has been adopted by a majority of federal jurisdictions and many state courts, Robertson; Jones v. Ownes-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712 (4th Cir.1995)(applying North Carolina law); Slaughter v. Southern Talc Co.…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · November 6, 2001
Allied Signal, Inc. v. Herring (2001)
Loyd Herring worked for Cummins Engine Company in Columbus, Indiana, from 1942 until he retired in 1978, and the opinion says he was exposed there to various forms of asbestos and asbestos-containing products. He was diagnosed with malignant…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)
… 1447(d) (emphasis added). We construed that language [\388] in Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124 (3d Cir.1998), where we held that "section 1447(d) prohibits review of remand orders \whether…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · April 30, 2007 · in the opinion
Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2007)
…a resident of South Carolina, the trial court focused on whether the cause of action arose in South Carolina, relying on Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 346 S.C. 37, 550 S.E.2d 589…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 25, 2005
Rehm v. Navistar International (2005)
…said he was exposed to asbestos insulation on pipes, furnaces, ovens and machinery while tearing out and installing equipment, and it claimed the owners were liable as premises owners. The owners argued that Kentucky's workers'…