No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

15 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 21, 2004

    Jessop v. Acf Industries, LLC (2004)

    …Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Topeka shops and rail yard; Topeka, Kansas rail yard of Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway, Topeka electrician Topeka, Kansas rail yard of Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Topeka sixteen year career

  2. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 2, 2004

    Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2004)

    …not know of mesothelioma specifically. It reinstated liability for CertainTeed, Fibreboard and Flintkote, found no error as to Foster Wheeler and General Electric, and removed Gasket Holding. It upheld the damage awards. Exxon owed a virile…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 22, 2000 · in the opinion

    Lonasco v. A-Best Products Co. (2000)

    …Industries, DAR Industrial Products, Inc., Fibreboard Corporation, Flexitallic Gasket Co., Flintkote Co., Foster Wheeler Corporation, GAF Corporation, Garlock Inc., General Electric Company, George V. Hamilton, Inc., Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Gibson-Homans, Gould, Inc., Keene Corporation, Melrath…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · May 27, 2002 · in the opinion

    Madden v. Able Supply Co. (2002)

    …GAF Corporation, defendants. [\698] Franklin A Poff, Jr, Crisp Boyd et al, Texarkana, TX, for General Refractories Co., defendant. David Jonathan Fisher, Fairchild Price et al, Center, TX, for JT thorpe Co., defendant. Gregory Michael Sullivan…

  5. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · January 18, 2008 · in the opinion

    Lee v. DuPONT (2008)

    …tearing-out, and general exposure to their asbestos products." Finally, Lee alleged that DuPont "intentionally and deliberately caused \[Duel\] to be exposed to asbestos" and "intentionally and deliberately failed to provide safety equipment to protect \[Duel…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · February 10, 2005 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2005)

    …that courts consider whether the party seeking the withdrawal or amendment has acted with due diligence. In more general terms, courts should seek to ascertain whether the aggrieved party was careless in not timely filing its…

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 17, 2003

    Garlock v. Gallagher (2003)

    …Sparrows Point plant (steel mill); General Motors plant, Halethorpe; Bethlehem Steel, Sparrows Point, Sparrows Point; General Motors plant, Halethorpe, Halethorpe pipe fitter Bethlehem Steel, Sparrows Point Sparrows Point 1946-1979; warehouseman General Motors plant, Halethorpe Halethorpe

  8. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · July 30, 2004

    Clephas v. Garlock, Inc. (2004)

    …testified that Charles had no asbestosis and no asbestos-caused condition. Garlock's pre-trial disclosure of him was only a general statement of subjects, and he was never made available for deposition despite a court…

  9. Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 25, 2003

    Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2003)

    …applied. One statute covers asbestos claims against those who mined and sold asbestos. The other is the general ten-year statute of repose for product claims. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants. The…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 30, 2002

    Hennegan v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co. (2002)

    …Garlock 80 percent at fault and the settling employer 20 percent, and awarded $2,500,000 in general damages plus $596,769.62 in special damages. On appeal Garlock argued that the court shifted the burden…

  11. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 20, 2006 · in the opinion

    Chaisson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2006)

    Accordingly, we hold that Zachry breached its general duty, under the facts and circumstances of this case, to Mrs. Chaisson by putting her in foreseeable risk [\190] of contracting an asbestos related disease from household exposure…

  12. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001

    Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)

    …not sellers of asbestos-containing products. The general ten-year repose period violates the open courts clause of Article I, Section 12 as applied to a latent asbestos disease where exposure began before the Act or…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    …time, can metastasize to other structures, including the diaphragm and the abdominal cavity. Although there is a background rate of mesothelioma in the general population that is not asbestos-related, it is very low. Dr. Samuel…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 28, 2001 · in the opinion

    Arnold v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)

    …s), the uniformity of source of the injury or wrongful death, and the general status of pending cases in the state courts and the effect a consolidation would have on them. \[13\] See Reply of Garlock…

  15. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 21, 2006 · in the opinion

    Gilcrease v. Garlock, Inc. (2006)

    …We do not address whether reversible error occurred from an improper final argument. Citing the general rule that recovery of actual damages are a prerequisite to the receipt of exemplary damages,\[8\] Garlock next maintains that…