No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 28, 2005

    Nesbiet v. General Electric Co. (2005)

    The court denied Nesbiet's motion to remand to state court, holding that General Electric properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute, and ruled GE's stay motion moot. A defendant seeking federal…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2007

    Briggs v. General Electric Co. (2007)

    …Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Long Island Lighting Company Glenwood Landing Powerhouse; Long Island Lighting Company's Glenwood Landing Powerhouse, Glenwood Landing electrician apprentice Long Island Lighting Company's Glenwood Landing Powerhouse Glenwood Landing early 1950s

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · September 17, 2007

    Machnik v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2007)

    The court denied Machnik's motion to remand to state court, finding that General Electric had justified federal officer removal, so the case stayed in federal court. A government contractor may remove under the federal officer…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · October 27, 2008

    Carroll v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)

    …Carrolls' motion to remand, holding that defendants Viad, General Electric and Buffalo Pumps properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. A defendant may remove under the federal officer statute, 28 U.S.C. …

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · May 4, 2009

    Holdren v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2009)

    …Foster Wheeler, Viad, General Electric and Elliott Turbo Machinery) removed the case to federal court. They relied on the federal officer removal statute and the federal contractor defense, arguing the Navy would not have allowed asbestos…