3 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · December 19, 2005 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2005)
…owned by defendant Unocal Corporation, that term is used to refer to either an owner or a possessor of land that owes some kind of duty of care to keep the premises safe. (See Alcaraz v…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 20, 2007 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2007)
…negligence theory) unless the manufacturer had actual or constructive knowledge of the potential hazard. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.) Unocal contends the notion of what constitutes a "hazard…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 18, 2003 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2003)
…to protect themselves against it, and \[¶\] (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger." Thus, a landowner owes a duty to invitees to exercise reasonable care in maintaining the premises. (§ 343; see […