No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · December 1, 2005 · in the opinion

    US v. WR Grace & Co. (2005)

    …§ 300.415(e) sets forth examples of activities that are "as a general rule," appropriate as part of a removal action, but notes that the list "is not exhaustive and is not intended to prevent the…

  2. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 29, 2009

    In re WR Grace & Co. (2009)

    The State of California, Department of General Services, filed sixteen property damage claims in W.R. Grace's Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The claims concerned asbestos-containing materials Grace made that were in sixteen state-owned buildings…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 17, 2004 · in the opinion

    In re Kensington International Limited (2004)

    …a distinction between newly-appointed and veteran judges; the general prohibition against ex part e communications on the merits applies to all judges. As for the second safeguard, we must first assume that all parties took…

  4. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    In re WR Grace & Co. (2006)

    …that is, that \the dose makes the poison,' which refers to the general tendency for a greater dose of a toxin to cause greater severity of responses in individuals, as well as greater frequency of response…