315 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 16 of 16
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 2004 · in the opinion
Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2004)
…N.E.2d 637, 639 (Ind.1991) ("A landowner owes the highest duty to an invitee: a duty to exercise reasonable care for his protection while he is on the landowner's premises."), reh'g denied…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (2009)
…decision, but was denied. However, Circuit Judge Owen wrote a dissent emphasizing the distinction in 28 U.S.C. § 1407 and suggesting that if Congress had wished for the statute to cover document production subpoenas, it…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2003 · in the opinion
Dekens v. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (2003)
…cognizance of Food and Drug Administration regulations concerning proper levels of lead in paint for toys. Similar dependence is placed on the Bureau of Radiological Health for permissible radiation levels from products such as microwave ovens, \[…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 18, 2003 · in the opinion
Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2003)
…to protect themselves against it, and \[¶\] (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger." Thus, a landowner owes a duty to invitees to exercise reasonable care in maintaining the premises. (§ 343; see […
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion
General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)
…a Ford engineer. They indicated that assembly lines, ovens, steel components, and extensive conveyor systems were necessary and essential to the manufacture and production of motor vehicles and that the dismantling of old assembly lines and…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 10, 2008 · in the opinion
Tabor v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2008)
…is clear that the allegations of plaintiff's petition refer only to acts or omissions that are excluded from coverage under the terms of the policy, then the insurer owes no duty to defend. Bourque v…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2008 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2008)
…Mogul Products, Inc.(FMP). FMP now owes to Pneumo Abex the indemnity that was originally provided by Wagner in the 1994 APA. The obligations that arise from the relationship with Cooper are two-fold. The first…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2009 · in the opinion
Short v. Sequoia Ventures, Inc. (2009)
…and accepted" doctrine, under which a builder or designer of a real property improvement owes no duty to a third party injured by a patent defect after the owner accepts the completed improvement. (See Jones v…
-
Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 22, 2006 · in the opinion
Hudson v. Delmarva Power & Light Co. (In re Asbestos Litigation Hudson Trial Group, 2006)
…the control of any part of the work, is subject to liability for physical harm to others for whose safety the employer owes a duty to exercise reasonable care, which is caused by his failure to…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota · October 15, 2005 · in the opinion
In re Api, Inc. (2005)
…exception among the insurers may be CNA, which alleges that the Debtor owes it a sum of money on account of the premium arrangement under the terms of its policy, and that that debt arose pre…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 13, 2005 · in the opinion
Flanders v. California Coastal Communities (2005)
…Holdings, Inc., are pitted against each other. Each denies that it owns the liabilities of M.W. Kellogg. The trial court concluded that the plaintiff had made a prima facie case of jurisdiction against California Coastal…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Texas · October 30, 2000 · in the opinion
In re National Gypsum Co. (2000)
…its assets would total approximately $374,713,686. Hilton testified that the trust owes asbestos property damage claimants $32,000,000. The Center contends that the trust owes approximately $197,836,030, for previously settled claims…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York · May 1, 2000 · in the opinion
Falise v. American Tobacco Co. (2000)
…Page Keeton, Dan B. Dobbs, Robert E. Keeton, & David G. Owen, Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts, § 42, at 279 (5th ed. 1984)) \[Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts\] (quoting 1 Street, Foundations…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 7, 2005 · in the opinion
Bunce v. Api, Inc. (2005)
…who is not in court, is protected because the money it paid the plaintiff through a Pierringer release settles once and for all the fixed amount it owes the plaintiff. If not all of the defendants…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 11, 2007 · in the opinion
Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)
…Siegler, 899 S.W.2d 195, 197 (Tex.1995) ("The threshold inquiry in a negligence case is whether the defendant owes a legal duty to the plaintiff."). If there is no legal duty, liability for negligence…