655 results for “General Electric”, page 24 of 33
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 17, 2000 · in the opinion
Ashdown v. Ameron International Corp. (2000)
…1982, the dual capacity exception to the general exclusivity of the workers' compensation remedy has been limited to the narrow factual circumstances presented where the employee's injury was caused by the employer's product, which…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · April 6, 2004 · in the opinion
Roberts v. ACandS, Inc. (2004)
…out of and in the course of the employment. Ordinary diseases of life to which the general public is exposed outside of the employment shall not be compensable, except where such diseases follow as an incident…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 9, 2005 · in the opinion
National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh v. Porter Hayden Company (2005)
…large number of asbestos-related bodily injury claims filed against it. Wallace & Gale had purchased comprehensive general liability policies and excess policies from numerous insurers during the decades it installed asbestos-containing insulation materials. In 1994…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 18, 2009 · in the opinion
Hymel v. Eagle, Inc. (2009)
…362 (La. 1980). It follows that the compromise instrument is governed by the same general rules of construction applicable to contracts. Brown, 630 So.2d at 748. When the words of a contract are clear and…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 2, 2009 · in the opinion
Kofler v. AW Chesteron (2009)
…Inc. ceased manufacturing asbestos-containing gasket material in 1969 and 1973 respectively. Goodyear's General Counsel asserts that Goodyear stopped manufacturing asbestos-containing gaskets before 1974. (Responses to Plaintiffs' First Standard Set of Interrogatories by G…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 3, 2009 · in the opinion
Beltrami v. AO Smith Water Prod. Co. (2009)
…from a Gorman product. Gorman contends, based upon its reply papers which for the first time on this motion contains an affidavit of its Vice President and General Manager Mark Kreinbihl, sworn to June 18, 2009…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · November 5, 2007 · in the opinion
LaPOINTE v. 3M Company (2007)
…Heatbath's products contained asbestos. Furthermore, although they agree that in general, a manufacturer does not have a duty to warn of reasonably foreseeable dangers posed by another manufacturer's products, they assert that the duty…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · November 30, 2000 · in the opinion
Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp. (2000)
…American argues that Pustejovsky's lack of knowledge of the scope of his damages from his exposure to asbestos does not affect the accrual of his cause of action. Following these general rules, Rapid American contends…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion
Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)
…unable to conclude that the jury's verdict was based on a finding of negligent failure to warn because the special verdict form is inconsistent.\[5\] [\715] The jury was given general negligence instructions BAJI Nos…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (2009)
…§ 1407(b). Some courts have read this grant of authority to conflict with the general guidance of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 which, in pertinent part, states that "the court by which a subpoena was…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion
Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)
…time, can metastasize to other structures, including the diaphragm and the abdominal cavity. Although there is a background rate of mesothelioma in the general population that is not asbestos-related, it is very low. Dr. Samuel…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · November 6, 2001 · in the opinion
Allied Signal, Inc. v. Herring (2001)
…[\1036] Moreover, section 2 was enacted to extend the general limitations period in express recognition of the long latency period associated with asbestos-related diseases and illnesses. Extending the limitations period only for the very few…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · April 3, 2008 · in the opinion
State EX rel. Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (2008)
…Borell Jr., for appellee. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and Sandra E. Pinkerton, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Workers' compensation — Occupational disease — Last-injurious-exposure rule — Liability of successor to self-insured employer. Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Donald…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · June 23, 2009 · in the opinion
Newinski v. John Crane, Inc. (2009)
…1981) (citations omitted). An exception to the general rule of joint and several liability applies when there are "independent consecutive acts of negligence and it is reasonably possible to determine which injuries were caused by which…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · July 17, 2003 · in the opinion
Bath Iron Works Corp. v. US Dept. of Labor (2003)
…injury and claim for benefits were timely filed." In a similar vein, the ALJ, citing § 920(b) and Fortier v. General Dynamics Corp., 15 B.R.B.S. 4 (1982), appeal dismissed sub nom, Insurance Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 13, 2001 · in the opinion
Royal Ins. Co. of America v. Miles & Stockbridge (2001)
…an asbestos lawsuit that was barred by limitations, res judicata, and a general release executed by the plaintiff in a prior lawsuit! In the wake of this monstrosity, the parties footing the bill and successive sets…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 23, 2004 · in the opinion
In re Sears, Roebuck and Co. (2004)
…they are entitled to discovery of all of Sears' asbestos-related products because the issue is Sears' knowledge of the danger of asbestos in general to show "what Sears knew and when it knew it." However…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · April 27, 2000 · in the opinion
Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. v. Azrock Industries Inc. (2000)
…s grant of summary judgment to Guaranty National. We must decide what event triggers an insurer's duty to defend its insured against asbestos-related personal injury claims under a Commercial General Liability ("CGL") policy, here…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · December 28, 2007 · in the opinion
Wille v. AC Product Liability Trust (2007)
…210 and 211) are also denied. As a general statement, Plaintiffs have provided sufficient lay and/or expert testimony to establish a prima facie case of whether there was "sufficient exposure" to these products by Plaintiffs…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 14, 2001 · in the opinion
Parks v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)
…disease and its cause constitutes a new injury and the basis for a separate cause of action. In general, product liability actions must be brought within two years after the cause of action accrues or within…