655 results for “General Electric”, page 25 of 33
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · October 31, 2006 · in the opinion
HK Porter Company, Inc. v. Transit Casualty Company IN Receivership (2006)
…when it was declared to be insolvent by the Cole County Circuit Court. At pertinent times herein, National Underwriting Agency ("NUA") was managing general agent for Transit. In April 1982, three years before Transit's insolvency…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2007 · in the opinion
Rosen v. Regents of University of California (2007)
…and premises liability. They sought both general and punitive damages.\[6\] A first amended complaint was filed in May 2002, adding causes of action against the Regents for making false representations and for loss of consortium…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 25, 2005 · in the opinion
Summers v. Certainteed Corp. (2005)
…is highly practical. Therefore, this decision is applicable only to asbestos-related cases and not to summary judgment cases in general. ¶ 5 Essentially, plaintiffs ask this Court en banc to overrule the panel decision in Quate…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion
Rahmes v. Adience Inc. (2007)
…contracting or selling or installation business? {¶ 23} "A. Yes. {¶ 24} "Q. And general idea, how far outside of Cincinnati, Cincinnati area would some of these operations take place? {¶ 25} "A. Do you have a time framework…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Nevada · February 23, 2005 · in the opinion
Knutson v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. (2005)
…1998). The doctrine serves as an exception to the general rule that a court must rely solely on the face of the complaint to determine if complete diversity between the plaintiffs and defendants is present. Id…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida · August 6, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Evans Products Company (2009)
…2006), stated, "In general, cases involve the same causes of action for purposes of res judicata if the present case \arises out of the same nucleus of operative fact, or is based upon the same factual…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 17, 2004 · in the opinion
In re Kensington International Limited (2004)
…a distinction between newly-appointed and veteran judges; the general prohibition against ex part e communications on the merits applies to all judges. As for the second safeguard, we must first assume that all parties took…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2008 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2008)
…the Plan B Settlement as the default, or fallback, settlement in the event that the court could not approve the Plan A Settlement.\[11\] Debtors' former General Counsel, John Gasparovic, testified that during "the negotiations of…
-
Court case · Mississippi Court of Appeals · July 18, 2006 · in the opinion
Brooks v. Stone Architecture (2006)
…Dr. Lorino repeatedly referred to "the literature" and "studies" in general. Courts are not required to "admit opinion evidence that is connected to existing data only by the ipse dixit of the expert," because self-proclaimed…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion
Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Co. (2007)
…approach a situation to which the term judicial estoppel is applicable. ¶ 28 The doctrine of judicial estoppel holds that "\[a\]s a general rule, a party to an action is estopped from assuming a position inconsistent…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion
Vince v. Crane Co. (2007)
…sua sponte order Owens-Illinois, Inc. dismissed from this appeal. \[3\] The General Assembly effectively overruled paragraph two of the syllabus to Horton with the adoption of R.C. 2307.96(B), effective to cases filed…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 29, 2009 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Aurora Equipment Company (2009)
…222 Ill. 2d at 437. The court then moved into a discussion of the Restatement (Second) of Torts and said that the general rule articulated in section 314A of the Restatement, "and long recognized by this…
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · April 19, 2007 · in the opinion
Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation Company, Inc. (2007)
…"Thus, the imposition of a legal duty reflects society's contemporary policies and social requirements concerning the right of individuals and the general public to be protected from another's act or conduct." Bradshaw, 854 S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · March 3, 2006 · in the opinion
US v. WR Grace (2006)
…upon the history of the registration process, which the Court interpreted to include a general understanding that registration was a discrete act to be completed on a designated date, and that failure to so comply at…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · February 1, 2005 · in the opinion
In re GI Holdings, Inc. (2005)
…Donnellon, Cincinnati, OH, Co-Counsel for C. Judson Hamlin, the Legal Representative of Present and Future Holders of Asbestos-Related Demands. Office of the Attorney General, State of Illinois, by Marilyn A. Kueper, Springfield, IL, Chief…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 31, 2007 · in the opinion
Varner v. Ford Motor Co. (2007)
…P.O. Box 9900, Brookpark, Ohio 44142, Attorneys for appellees for ford Motor Company. Marc Dann, Ohio Attorney General, Dawn M. Tarka, Assistant Attorney General, 615 West Superior Avenue, 11th Floor, Cleveland, Ohio 44113, for Bureau…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)
…a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 25, 2008 · in the opinion
Lapointe v. 3M Company (2008)
…1126 (R.I. 2001) (citations omitted); Volino v. General Dynamics, 539 A.2d 531, 532-533 (R.I 1988). It is well-settled that a genuine issue of material fact is one about which reasonable minds…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · June 23, 2006 · in the opinion
Barone v. Gatx Corp. (2006)
…of asbestos dust. On February 27, 2003, appellee filed a claim for employer intentional tort and wrongful death against appellant, GATX Corporation ("GATX"), General American Transportation Corporation, the Gage Company, I.U. North America, Inc., Garlock…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 14, 2000 · in the opinion
Sybron Transition v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford (2000)
…may be considered mutually exclusively rather than seriatim. The Olin court started with the proposition that under a general comprehensive liability insurance policy construed pursuant to New York law, the insurer is normally liable only for…