No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

655 results for “General Electric”, page 26 of 33

  1. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · September 18, 2003 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. AC & S., Inc. (2003)

    …the suit, but subsequent to the injuries, the plaintiff executed a general release freeing the railroad from liability for the injuries sustained in the accident in exchange for two hundred and fifty dollars. Callen, 332 U…

  2. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · January 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    In re Congoleum Corp. (2007)

    …of asbestos claims including: (i) all of the Debtors' interest in asbestos insurance coverage provided in their general liability insurance (ii) 3,800,000 new shares of Congoleum Class A common stock (but only if the…

  3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · March 9, 2006 · in the opinion

    Mobil Oil Corp. v. Bailey (2006)

    …972 S.W.2d at 728). Helton, 133 S.W.3d at 254. Toxic tort cases usually require proof of both "general" and "specific" causation with regard to the effects of the toxic substance. Frias v…

  4. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota · October 15, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Api, Inc. (2005)

    …without the insurer's consent to the terms of settlement. Such terms again are a justifiable incident of the insurers' general right to manage the processing of claims; they reflect insurers' understandable interest in containing their…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · August 24, 2006 · in the opinion

    US v. Grace (2006)

    …EPA. The Government alleges that Defendants Stringer and EPA made the following misleading statements in their CERCLA 104(e) response: that W.R. GRACE did not provide vermiculite to the general public; that W.R. GRACE…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Croteau v. Treadwell Corp. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2007)

    …301] itself, preclude Con Edison from obtaining indemnification from Treadwell. The subsequent enactment of General Obligations Law § 5-322.1 in 1975 has no retroactive applicability to this situation (see Sapper v St. Vincent's Hosp…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 28, 2005 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2005)

    …Earth, including consideration of the chemistry of its constituent materials. These general definitions indicate that knowledge or understanding of chemical compositions and compounds is required in the scientific specialties of geology and geochemistry. Considering Dr. De…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 16, 2007 · in the opinion

    Garcia v. Duro Dyne Corporation (2007)

    …(Owens); (2) distributors including Thorpe Insulation Company (Thorpe) and Bell Industries, Inc. (Bell),\[1\] and (3) general contractors including Holmes and Narver, Inc. (Holmes). The Garcias proceeded to trial against just two defendants, Duro Dyne and…

  9. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · April 24, 2006 · in the opinion

    Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2006)

    …625 A.2d 1110). B. Applying those general principles of tort liability to the facts of this case, the risk of injury to someone like Eleanor Olivo is one that should have been foreseeable to Exxon…

  10. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)

    …102 S.Ct. 2579, 73 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982)). \[12\] The express reservation test is similar to the rule of general retroactivity discussed by this court in pre-Robinson decisions. Haines, 87 Wash.2d at…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Aguirre v. Long Island Railroad Co. (2007)

    …motion, the LIRR primarily argues that the plaintiffs failed at trial to proffer legally sufficient evidence to support their claims of general and specific causation with respect to their alleged exposure to asbestos and unidentified dusts…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    In re New York City Asbestos Litigation v. AC & S., Inc. (2009)

    …Dalton was a plumber, Flynn was an iron worker, McNamara was a roofer, Troiano was a plumber/general contractor and Zeitler was a sailor/painter (see Comeford Aff. in Support of Consolidation OSC at ¶¶ 7-18…

  13. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    In re WR Grace & Co. (2006)

    …that is, that \the dose makes the poison,' which refers to the general tendency for a greater dose of a toxin to cause greater severity of responses in individuals, as well as greater frequency of response…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Ransford v. Griffin Wheel Company, Inc. (2009)

    …law damage suits by former railroad workers against a locomotive manufacturer for personal injury allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos in the manufacturer's products. (Scheiding v. General Motors Corp. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 471, 474…

  15. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 13, 2005 · in the opinion

    Flanders v. California Coastal Communities (2005)

    …There are, however, four exceptions to this general rule: "(1) where there is an express or implied agreement of assumption; (2) where the transaction amounts to a consolidation or merger of the purchaser or seller corporation;…

  16. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 30, 2002 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois v. Gianotti (2002)

    …v. Martin, 14 Pa. D. & C.3d 325, 328 (1980)); and "the time of the accident" (Hendrix v. General Motors, 146 Cal.App.3d 296, 193 Cal.Rptr. 922, 927 (1983)). See Miles, 58 Md.App…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2008 · in the opinion

    Garza v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2008)

    …sufficient contact with the state for the court to assume either general or limited jurisdiction over it. Plaintiffs opposed the motion, asserting among other things that ACL had consented to jurisdiction by making a general appearance…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 3, 2004 · in the opinion

    Bartel v. John Crane, Inc. (2004)

    …§§ 688, et seq., the General Admiralty and Maritime law, and traditional product liability law. ECF No. 1. Lindstrom claims that he contracted this disease as a result of his work-life exposures to asbestos and asbestos…

  19. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · March 10, 2003 · in the opinion

    Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Ayers (2003)

    …B. Salmons argued the cause pro hac vice for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Olson, Assistant Attorney General McCallum, Deputy Solicitor General Clement, Anthony J…

  20. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · March 31, 2005 · in the opinion

    West v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2005)

    …America, Inc., a Delaware corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to Nuturn Corporation; Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation; General Motors, a Delaware corporation; G.I. Joe's, an Oregon corporation; Metalclad Insulation Corporation, a…