No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

315 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 5 of 16

  1. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · August 31, 2007 · in the opinion

    Asbestos Corporation Limited v. Akaiwa (2007)

    …motions. The court certified its orders for interlocutory appeal, which we accepted. DISCUSSION AND DECISION Standard of Review Our standard of review for summary judgment appeals is well established. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Cobb, 754…

  2. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion

    Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. (2009)

    …the jury against North Brothers arose from North Brothers' alleged sales of asbestos containing products to DuPont. These products were alleged to have been manufactured by Owens Corning Fiberglass, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, Johns Manville and Raybestos…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 11, 2008 · in the opinion

    Norris v. Crane Company (2008)

    …and reasonably foreseeable manner; or (2) whether the benefits of the challenged design outweigh the risk of danger inherent in the design. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 3, 2009 · in the opinion

    Hogston v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. (2009)

    …2). III. DISCUSSION A. Virginia Substantive Law — Proving Exposure to Asbestos Under Virginia law,\[3\] a plaintiff may prove exposure to an asbestos product relying only on circumstantial evidence. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson, 243…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    Hackett v. John Crane, Inc. (2002)

    …Cal.App.4th 847, 852-859, 97 Cal. Rptr.2d 240 (Wilson); Arena v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal. App.4th 1178, 1197, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580.) Under Proposition 51, Crane is jointly…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 13, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2005)

    …together legal experience. (Tr. at 49.) Among the original members were notable asbestos-defendants Eagle-Picher, Pittsburgh Corning, Celotex Corp., Fibreboard Corp., and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., U.S. Gypsum and National Gypsum, and insurers such…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    Hebert v. Anco Insulation, Inc. (2002)

    …Additionally, the jury concluded that six manufacturers with whom plaintiffs had settled prior to trial, Garlock Corporation, Johns-Manville Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. and Flexitallic Gasket Company, Inc…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)

    …1986, section 1431.2 is the "heart" of Proposition 51, formally but less widely known as the Fair Responsibility Act of 1986. (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 528, fn. 3…

  9. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · April 16, 2009 · in the opinion

    Nolan v. Weil-McLain (2009)

    …509, 106 Ill.Dec. 422, 505 N.E.2d 1213 (1987). Plaintiff, relying on Kochan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 242 Ill.App.3d 781, 790, 182 Ill.Dec. 814, 610 N.E.2d 683 (1993)…

  10. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · April 19, 2007 · in the opinion

    Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation Company, Inc. (2007)

    …Widera, 611 N.Y.S.2d at 569-71. \[10\] Alcoa also cites Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 965 F.2d 844 (10th Cir. 1992); Adams v. Owens-Ill., Inc., 705 A.2d 58 (Md…

  11. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 27, 2006 · in the opinion

    Nolan v. Weil-McLain (2006)

    …including the Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, alleging that the manufacturers were responsible for her husband's asbestos-exposure injuries and resulting death. Prior to trial, all defendants with the exception of Owens-Corning settled or were…

  12. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 5, 2000 · in the opinion

    Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2000)

    …in that no reasonable finder of fact could determine from the evidence that Garlock, Inc., Uniroyal Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., Johns Manville Corp., Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Dr. John Konzen or Richard F…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)

    … 1447(d) (emphasis added). We construed that language [\388] in Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124 (3d Cir.1998), where we held that "section 1447(d) prohibits review of remand orders \whether…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 19, 2003 · in the opinion

    Ewing v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2003)

    …claim were analyzed, the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal stated that "a cause of action arises when negligent or tortious conduct causes injury." Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 444 So.2d 788, 790 (La…

  15. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 15, 2008 · in the opinion

    Sarkozy v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2008)

    …CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., PFIZER, INC., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., formerly known as Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, individually and as successor to and/or alter ego of Pittsburgh Corning Corporation…

  16. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · April 30, 2007 · in the opinion

    Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2007)

    …a resident of South Carolina, the trial court focused on whether the cause of action arose in South Carolina, relying on Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 346 S.C. 37, 550 S.E.2d 589…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)

    …is made." Thus, we are not \[privileged\] to dissect the evidence and weigh the credibility of its messengers, which is what Crane has asked us to do. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…

  18. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 14, 2005 · in the opinion

    Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2005)

    …risk of personal injury and/or property damage. Id. Bystanders may recover for personal injuries or wrongful death caused by exposure to asbestos. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Martin, 942 S.W.2d 712 (Tex…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 2, 2003 · in the opinion

    Lindstrom v. AC Products Liability Trust (2003)

    …that he has suffered damages, and 3) prove that defendant's asbestos-containing product was a substantial factor in causing his damages. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W.D.Mich…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 17, 2000 · in the opinion

    Ashdown v. Ameron International Corp. (2000)

    …the date of the decedent's injury as a matter of law. Appellants cite the Supreme Court's opinion in Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438…