No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

655 results for “General Electric”, page 7 of 33

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 18, 2003 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2003)

    …38 P.3d 1081). However, the observations in Grahn about general premises liability remain good law. In Grahn, as in the case before us, the premises owner challenged a generic jury instruction describing a landowner's…

  2. Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · October 22, 2008 · in the opinion

    DiCenzo v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2008)

    …Temple should receive prospective-only application. DiCenzo makes three arguments in response: (1) the general rule is that judicial decisions are applied retrospectively absent language indicating otherwise, and because Temple did not specify that it applies…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 19, 2007 · in the opinion

    Palermo v. Port of New Orleans (2007)

    …the ship repair companies in this case had a general duty to act reasonably to prevent any foreseeable risks of harm to the plaintiffs from asbestos exposure that might be caused by proximity of their operations…

  4. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · May 21, 2002 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. (2002)

    …I. ¶ 2. Jerold Anderson worked for many years as a machinist for the Wisconsin Electric Power Company at its Oak Creek power plant. There were eight coal-fired boilers at the plant during this time. The…

  5. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · January 18, 2008 · in the opinion

    Lee v. DuPONT (2008)

    …tearing-out, and general exposure to their asbestos products." Finally, Lee alleged that DuPont "intentionally and deliberately caused \[Duel\] to be exposed to asbestos" and "intentionally and deliberately failed to provide safety equipment to protect \[Duel…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · January 28, 2003 · in the opinion

    Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc. (2003)

    …liable where his conduct is merely negligent and causes only emotional injury unaccompanied by physical injury. This court noted deviations from this general rule in various situations, including those cases that involve "fright or nervous shock…

  7. Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · June 30, 2003 · in the opinion

    Hoskins v. Business Men's Assurance (2003)

    …James R. Layton, State Solicitor, Charles W. Hatfield, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for the State of Missouri. Before ELLIS, C.J., and HOWARD and NEWTON, JJ. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · November 13, 2006 · in the opinion

    Bartel EX rel. Estate, Rich v. AC Prod. Liab. Tr. (2006)

    …Just after World War' H, Rich was a merchant seaman; he worked as an engineer and electrician on ships for five years from 1945-1950. In 1955, Rich began work as an engineer at a jet…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · December 1, 2005 · in the opinion

    US v. WR Grace & Co. (2005)

    …§ 300.415(e) sets forth examples of activities that are "as a general rule," appropriate as part of a removal action, but notes that the list "is not exhaustive and is not intended to prevent the…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · March 31, 2009 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. AC Product Liability Trust (2009)

    …Executor from August 11, 1969 to December 2, 1969, Jackson held an entry-level position known as a wiper. His duties included general cleaning, washing down the engine room, mopping, chipping and painting (Tr. 377-78…

  11. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · May 12, 2009 · in the opinion

    Tatera v. FMC Corp. (2009)

    …Mulhern, the court noted that the "stream of commerce" requirement is consistent with the application of § 402A in Wisconsin, citing Barter v. General Motors Corp., 70 Wis.2d 796, 235 N.W.2d 523 (1975). Mulhern…

  12. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 8, 2005 · in the opinion

    Zimko v. American Cyanamid (2005)

    …that subjecting its employees to occupational levels of asbestos would result in harm. The general rule in Louisiana is that an employee's exclusive remedy for work-related personal injuries or occupational diseases is in workers…

  13. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · February 6, 2008 · in the opinion

    Plympton v. American Standard (inc.) (2008)

    …L. 1956 §8-2-14.\[2\] I Facts and Travel The Plaintiff and decedent, Wayne Plympton, worked as a general contractor during the late 1960s and early 1970s. Plympton Deposition dated May 20, 2005, at 53…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · April 4, 2002 · in the opinion

    Upsher v. Grosse Pointe Public School System (2002)

    …34 F.3d at 349 (internal citation omitted). Despite uncontested evidence that the applicable safety and electrical code standards had been violated, this court upheld the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · August 26, 2003 · in the opinion

    US v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn. (2003)

    …269:13-15, 271:15-17, 272:16-21. The indirect cost pool for the Superfund program includes indirect costs such as rent, electricity, training, management and supervision of employees, and the management and implementation of…

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 5, 2009 · in the opinion

    Crowder V AW Chesterton Co. (2009)

    …date the party last parted with possession or control of the product" constituted a substantive law (see, Connecticut General Statute §52-577\[a\]). In Blatz v. Westinehouse Electric Corp., 274 A.D.2d 491 (2nd Dept.…

  17. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · November 5, 2003 · in the opinion

    In re Sears, Roebuck and Co. (2003)

    …heaters and boilers of any brand name (not just Homart), and added furnaces and heaters. Further, the lists included materials and products allegedly "associated" with these appliances, including electric elements, fittings, repair parts, accessories, pipe coverings…

  18. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 4, 2005 · in the opinion

    Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Little (2005)

    …Commonwealth, 253 Va. 180, 182, 482 S.E.2d 810, 811-12 (1997); Mizenko v. Electric Motor & Contracting Co., 244 Va. 152, 156, 419 S.E.2d 637, 640 (1992) (citing East River S.S. Corp…

  19. Court case · Minnesota Supreme Court · October 4, 2001 · in the opinion

    Conwed v. Union Carbide Chem. and Plastics (2001)

    …thereby giving Conwed the present right to bring a subrogation suit against Union Carbide. We disagree. As a general rule, an employee's cause of action for workers' compensation benefits stemming from an occupational disease does…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Ransom v. Calaveras Asbestos, Ltd. (2009)

    …pipe between 1971 and 1976. While working with asbestos cement pipe, Mr. Cookus used an electric saw to cut pipe in a trench. Dust would blow all over the place. Mr. Cookus worked with the Alex…